WTRU Grant-Free Access Adaptation in Unlicensed Bands

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current mobile communication systems face challenges in efficiently managing transmission adaptation and grant-free access in unlicensed bands, particularly in ensuring reliable channel availability and minimizing interference among multiple users.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of flexible transmission boundaries and grant-free access resource pools, combined with clear channel assessments (CCAs) in a beam-based system, allows wireless transmit/receive units (WTRUs) to adapt transmission parameters such as time and frequency resources, MIMO schemes, and demodulation reference signals (DM-RS) for efficient channel access.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If grant-free access is implemented in unlicensed bands, then channel access efficiency is improved, but interference among multiple users increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel access efficiencyVSAvoidinterference among multiple users
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The resource pool is segmented into multiple sub-pools with different characteristics (e.g., different time-frequency resources, different beam directions). Users can select appropriate sub-pools based on channel conditions and interference levels, thereby improving access efficiency while managing interference through spatial and spectral separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different resource pools are assigned with different qualities or characteristics suitable for different transmission scenarios. For example, some resource pools may be optimized for low-latency transmissions while others for high-reliability transmissions. This allows users to select resources matching their specific needs, improving overall system efficiency while reducing interference through differentiated resource allocation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Adaptability or versatility

If flexible transmission boundaries are used, then transmission adaptability is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission adaptabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The transmission boundaries (time slots, frequency resources) are made dynamic rather than fixed. Resource pools can be flexibly configured and adjusted based on channel conditions, traffic demands, and interference levels. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to respond to changing conditions while the underlying structure provides guidance to manage complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Key transmission parameters such as time resource allocation, frequency resource allocation, and beamforming parameters are made changeable based on channel conditions. The system can adjust these parameters dynamically within predefined ranges, providing adaptability while the predefined ranges and structures constrain the complexity of management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If clear channel assessments are performed periodically, then channel availability reliability is improved, but transmission delay increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel availability reliabilityVSAvoidtransmission delay
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Clear channel assessments are performed in advance at predetermined intervals or trigger points before actual transmissions. This preliminary checking ensures that when transmission opportunities arise, the channel status is already known, reducing the need for additional assessment delays while maintaining reliability through periodic verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Clear channel assessments are conducted periodically at configured intervals rather than continuously or on every transmission attempt. This periodic approach balances the need for reliable channel knowledge with the need to minimize assessment overhead and delay, allowing the system to maintain up-to-date channel awareness while avoiding excessive timing losses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS20250106888A1Transmission adaptation and grant-free access
Publication Date: 2025.03.27 INTERDIGITAL PATENT HOLDINGS INC
  • US20250106888A1 patent drawing
  • US20250106888A1 patent drawing
  • US20250106888A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A wireless transmit receive unit (WTRU) may receive a set of candidate resources, which may be used for transmission. The WTRU may periodically perform CCA on a channel (e.g., before transmitting on the channel). When the channel is determined to be free, the WTRU may determine a resource for transmission from the candidate resources. The resource may be determined based on the time remaining in the time period. For example, when the time remaining in the time period is shorter, the WTRU may determine to transmit on a resource that comprises more frequency resources. The WTRU may determine a Multiple Input Multiple Output (MIMO) scheme based on the number of frequency resources. The WTRU may send a transmission on the resource, which may include a demodulation reference signal (DM-RS). The DM-RS may indicate the resource used from transmission to a receiver of the transmission.