X-Ray Artifact Reduction Through Selective Projection Inpainting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

X-ray images of subjects with metal or polymer objects often suffer from distortions and artifacts due to differential attenuation and scattering, which are amplified in three-dimensional reconstructions, hindering clear image confirmation and procedural accuracy.

Innovation Solution

An imaging system and navigation system are integrated to track and correct distortions by inpainting known components, using algorithms to account for the effects of non-tissue materials like metal implants, allowing for precise image reconstruction and reduction of artifacts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional X-ray imaging is used to image subjects with metal or polymer objects, then the imaging process is simple and fast, but the images suffer from distortions and artifacts due to differential attenuation and scattering

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage accuracyVSAvoidimaging system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The imaging system separates the image processing into distinct segments: acquiring raw projections, identifying artifact regions caused by non-tissue materials, and selectively correcting only those regions through inpainting. This segmentation allows the system to maintain simplicity while improving image accuracy by focusing computational resources only where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary processing step between traditional X-ray imaging and final image display. This intermediary layer identifies and corrects artifacts caused by metal or polymer objects through selective inpainting, acting as a mediator that enhances image reliability without requiring complete system redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of information

If three-dimensional reconstruction is performed from two-dimensional projections, then the reconstruction provides comprehensive subject information, but the distortions and artifacts are amplified

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation completenessVSAvoidreconstruction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary artifact correction on the two-dimensional projections before they are used for three-dimensional reconstruction. By identifying and inpainting artifact regions in the raw projection data beforehand, the system prevents distortion amplification during the reconstruction process while maintaining complete subject information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system converts the harmful effect of amplified artifacts into a benefit by using the known geometry and material properties of implants to guide selective correction. The very regions that cause problems during reconstruction are identified and corrected in advance, turning the artifact amplification issue into an opportunity for targeted improvement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Reliability

If artifact correction is applied to reduce distortions, then the image quality improves, but the computational time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidcomputational time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies artifact correction only to local regions where non-tissue materials are detected, rather than processing the entire image uniformly. This local quality approach maintains high image quality in artifact-prone areas while minimizing computational time by leaving other regions unchanged.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs partial correction by focusing computational resources only on the portions of the image affected by metal or polymer objects. This partial action approach achieves sufficient image quality improvement without the excessive computational burden of processing the entire image.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Loss of information

If non-tissue materials like metal implants are present in the field of view, then the imaging system can capture complete anatomical information, but the materials attenuate and scatter X-rays causing distortion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanatomical information completenessVSAvoidX-ray distortion
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and isolates the harmful effect of non-tissue materials by identifying regions where metal or polymer objects attenuate and scatter X-rays. By separating the artifact-causing regions from the rest of the image, the system can correct only those specific areas while preserving complete anatomical information from other regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary correction process that addresses the harmful effects of non-tissue materials without removing them from the field of view. This intermediary layer compensates for X-ray distortion caused by implants while maintaining the ability to capture complete anatomical information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system enables efficient and accurate image reconstruction with reduced computational time, providing clear distinctions between implants and surrounding tissues, enhancing procedural precision and reducing artifacts in X-ray images.

Implementation Method 1

The X-rays emitted from a source may be in a spectrum around an average or within a selected boundary. Accordingly, an X-ray source emitting X-rays at a selected energy, such as 120 kilo-electronvolts (keV), may actually be X-rays that are emitted at a range or in a spectrum around this amount. Accordingly, the attenuation may be different for each of the particular X-ray energies.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectX-ray attenuation: Absorption (EM radiation)

Implementation Method 2

For example, non-tissue materials may attenuate and/or reflect or scatter X-rays away from the item in the field of view (FOV) of the X-ray source or detector.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectX-ray scattering: Scattering

Data Source

PatentUS12387395B2System and method for artifact reduction in an image
Publication Date: 2025.08.12 MEDTRONIC NAVIGATION INC
  • US12387395B2 patent drawing
  • US12387395B2 patent drawing
  • US12387395B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Selected artifacts, which may be based on distortions or selected attenuation features, may be reduced or removed from a reconstructed image. Various artifacts may occur due to the presence of a metal object in a field of view. The metal object may be identified and removed from a data that is used to generate a reconstruction.