AI Model Weight Reduction With XAI Equivalence Evaluation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional weight reduction processing of AI models does not evaluate changes in model performance and fairness before and after the reduction, potentially leading to deteriorated equivalence.

Innovation Solution

An information processing device evaluates the equivalence between a pre-compression and post-compression model using eXplainable AI (XAI) technologies, determining the final model based on the evaluation results to ensure performance and fairness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If weight reduction processing is performed on the AI model to reduce operation amount and processor load, then productivity is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to potential changes in model equivalence and fairness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation amount reductionVSAvoidmodel equivalence
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by evaluating equivalence between the pre-compression and post-compression models using XAI technology. The control unit compares the behavior and decisions of both models to determine if they maintain equivalent performance, providing feedback that guides whether the weight reduction preserves model reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces XAI technology as an intermediary to assess model equivalence. This intermediary evaluation mechanism bridges the gap between weight reduction and reliability preservation by providing objective metrics to determine if the compressed model maintains the same performance characteristics as the original model

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If weight reduction processing is performed to reduce model size and computation, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision deteriorates in evaluating model performance changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel sizeVSAvoidperformance evaluation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical performance evaluation methods with XAI-based equivalence evaluation. Instead of relying on conventional metrics that may not capture subtle performance changes, the system uses explainable AI techniques to precisely measure and compare model behavior, achieving higher measurement precision in evaluating performance changes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20260004122A1Information processing device, information processing method, computer-readable non-transitory storage medium, and terminal device
Publication Date: 2026.01.01 SONY SEMICON SOLUTIONS CORP
  • US20260004122A1 patent drawing
  • US20260004122A1 patent drawing
  • US20260004122A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An information processing device includes a control unit. The control unit evaluates equivalence between a first learning model before weight reduction by a weight reduction method and a second learning model after the weight reduction by the weight reduction method. The control unit determines the second learning model on the basis of a result of the evaluation.