Personalized Anticancer Agent Screening via Xenograft Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for selecting personalized anticancer agents are expensive, time-consuming, and unable to verify the effectiveness of selected agents in patients, as they rely on in vitro methods and cannot confirm therapeutic responses.

Innovation Solution

A system that includes in vivo screening and verification using cancer cells from patients, where candidate agents are tested on xenograft animal models to select personalized anticancer agents showing optimal activity, allowing for prior examination of therapeutic responses and reducing trial and error in cancer therapy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If in vitro methods are used to screen personalized anticancer agents, then the screening process can be performed, but it is expensive, time-consuming, and unable to verify therapeutic effectiveness in patients

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverification of therapeutic effectivenessVSAvoidscreening time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses patient-derived cancer cells as a copy of the patient's actual cancer tissue, which can be cultured and tested in vitro to predict in vivo response. This copying approach allows verification of therapeutic effectiveness without requiring actual patient trials, thus improving reliability while reducing time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces xenograft animal models as an intermediary system between in vitro cell culture and actual patient treatment. The animal models serve as a intermediate verification step that can predict human therapeutic response more accurately than cell culture alone, while avoiding the need for time-consuming and risky patient trials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If in vitro screening methods are used to select personalized anticancer agents, then agent selection can be performed, but the cost and time required are high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonalized agent selectionVSAvoidcost and time resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the personalized screening process into distinct stages: in vitro screening of patient cancer cells followed by in vivo verification using xenograft animal models. This segmentation allows the most resource-intensive in vivo testing to be performed only on a reduced set of candidate agents that have already shown promise in preliminary in vitro tests, thus maintaining adaptability while reducing overall cost and time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary in vitro screening of multiple candidate anticancer agents against patient-derived cancer cells before proceeding to more expensive and time-consuming in vivo verification. This preliminary action filters out ineffective agents early, reducing the number of candidates that require resource-intensive subsequent testing, thereby lowering overall costs and time requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20230213501A1Personalized anti -cancer agent screening system
Publication Date: 2023.07.06 AIMED BIO INC
  • US20230213501A1 patent drawing
  • US20230213501A1 patent drawing
  • US20230213501A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a system for screening personalized anticancer agents, a method for screening personalized anticancer agents using the system, and an apparatus for screening personalized anticancer agents. When the inventive system for screening personalized anticancer agents is used, an anticancer agent showing an optimal anticancer activity against cancer cells collected from a patient can be selected from a variety of anticancer agents, and it is possible to previously examine a therapeutic response that can appear when the selected anticancer agent is administered into the patient. Thus, the risk of trial and error in cancer therapy can be reduced, and the cost and time required for cancer therapy can be reduced.