XML Change Management Grouping and Nesting
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Current XML document formats lack standardized change-tracking capabilities, particularly in managing complex, multi-layered changes and tracing the origin and effectiveness of amendments, which is crucial for industries like legislative and regulatory drafting.
Innovation Solution
A method and system for extending change management in XML documents by allowing changes to be grouped, nested, and annotated with metadata, enabling users to track and manage changes through a graphical user interface, with features like change set grouping, nesting, and metadata storage for provenance and effectivity.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Adaptability or versatility
If traditional change tracking features are implemented in XML-based formats, then basic insertion, deletion, and formatting changes can be tracked, but the system lacks the capability to group changes by origin, nest changes, and record metadata such as provenance and effectivity instructions
Solution Approach 1:
The patent segments changes into discrete change sets, where each change set represents a logical grouping of related changes. This segmentation allows changes to be organized by origin, tracked independently, and managed as cohesive units rather than individual modifications, thereby enhancing adaptability without proportionally increasing complexity
Solution Approach 2:
The patent implements nesting by allowing change sets to contain nested change sets, creating a hierarchical structure. This enables multi-level grouping where changes can be organized within changes within changes, providing flexible organization and traceability while maintaining a manageable system architecture through recursive structure
2Loss of information
If multiple parties propose amendments to legislative and regulatory documents, then comprehensive change tracking is needed, but traditional methods cannot interrelate changes, trace origin, or record effectivity dates
Solution Approach 1:
The patent creates a universal metadata structure that serves multiple functions simultaneously: tracking provenance, recording effectivity dates, identifying change origin, and establishing relationships between changes. This multi-functional metadata system prevents information loss across diverse tracking requirements while avoiding the need for separate specialized systems for each function
Solution Approach 2:
The patent introduces metadata as an intermediary layer between the XML document content and the change tracking system. This metadata acts as a mediator that captures and preserves all necessary information about changes without directly modifying the document structure, thereby preventing information loss while maintaining system simplicity
3Ease of operation
If changes are tracked individually in XML documents, then basic change visibility is achieved, but users cannot accept or reject changes as groups, nor can they distinguish editorial changes from other incorporated changes
Solution Approach 1:
The patent merges multiple individual changes into unified change sets that can be accepted or rejected as a group. This combining of changes maintains ease of operation by allowing batch processing of related modifications while preserving the ability to track and classify each individual change within the set through associated metadata
Solution Approach 2:
The patent applies local quality by adding specific metadata attributes to change sets that distinguish editorial changes from other types of incorporated changes. This localized differentiation at the change set level enables classification and identification of change types without requiring a complete system redesign, maintaining operational simplicity while preventing information loss
Data Source
AI summary
The present invention provides more robust change management features to an XML document by allowing a user to interrelate changes. The system and method allow a user to group a set of changes together, nest a change within a group of changes, relate effectivity information about a change, and detect conflicting changes. This more robust change management feature will allow for greater collaboration, clarity, and efficiency in a workplace where many users may be working on a number of different areas in a document.