XML-Configured Software Service Platform for ERP Tax Compliance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Software service platforms often fail to provide customized services tailored to the specific needs of individual users across different industries, leading to inefficiencies and inaccuracies in tax compliance due to varying tax jurisdictions and complex tax rules.

Innovation Solution

A software platform that allows for customizable configuration files in XML format, enabling users to create and execute customized hooks and processes through a mapper component, which integrates with ERP systems to perform services like address validation and tax calculation, using a tax-assisting service platform with engines for address validation and tax computation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a standardized software service platform is used, then ease of operation is improved, but adaptability to different user needs and industries deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidadaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic customization where the software platform can be configured at runtime through XML configuration files. Users can dynamically adjust tax calculation rules, address validation parameters, and service configurations without requiring system reinstallation or complex programming, thus achieving both ease of operation and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows parameter changes by enabling users to modify configuration parameters in XML files. These parameters control various aspects of tax calculation, address validation, and service behavior. By changing these parameters, the system adapts to different industries and user needs while maintaining the same underlying platform, balancing ease of operation with versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If generic tax calculation services are provided, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision of tax compliance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidmeasurement precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by allowing different tax calculation rules and parameters to be configured for different regions, industries, or user contexts. The XML configuration files enable localized tax rules to be specified without affecting the entire system, thus maintaining low device complexity while achieving high measurement precision for tax compliance in each specific context.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-configuring tax calculation rules and parameters in XML files before actual tax computation. This allows the system to have generic, simple code structures while achieving precise tax calculations through pre-set, industry-specific or region-specific parameters, resolving the contradiction between complexity and precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If manual tax compliance configuration is required, then adaptability to specific needs is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadaptabilityVSAvoidloss of time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses copying by providing pre-configured XML templates for different industries and tax jurisdictions. Users can copy these templates and make minimal modifications rather than configuring everything from scratch, thus achieving high adaptability while significantly reducing the time investment required for setup and maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Device complexity

If standardized address validation is used, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision of compliance validation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidmeasurement precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality to address validation by allowing different validation rules, formats, and requirements to be configured for different regions or industries through XML parameters. The core validation engine remains simple and generic, while precise, location-specific validation rules are loaded from configuration files, achieving both low device complexity and high measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20250330400A1Software service platform
Publication Date: 2025.10.23 AVALARA INC
  • US20250330400A1 patent drawing
  • US20250330400A1 patent drawing
  • US20250330400A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Some embodiments of the present disclosure may relate generally to platforms for providing software services. Other embodiments may be disclosed and/or claimed.