Kernel Assignment for XPU Energy Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current computational frameworks for XPU-based systems prioritize performance over power and thermal efficiency, leading to increased costs and carbon footprint, which is at odds with the industry's vision for sustainable computing.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of Power Thermal Cognizant Compute Kernels (PTCCK) within the Intel oneAPI framework, which determines energy-related metrics for each XPU and optimally assigns compute kernels to minimize energy consumption and thermal impact by considering capabilities and constraints of various processing units.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If performance-driven heuristics are used to drive computational kernels on XPU hardware, then computational performance is improved, but energy consumption increases and power efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational performanceVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically selects and switches between different compute kernels based on runtime conditions including energy metrics, thermal state, and performance requirements. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to optimize for performance when needed and for energy efficiency when appropriate, resolving the contradiction between computational performance and energy consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters by selecting different compute kernels with varying characteristics (performance vs. energy efficiency). The kernel selection is based on multiple parameters including energy metrics, thermal state, and performance requirements, allowing the system to adjust its operational mode to resolve the performance-energy tradeoff

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If performance-driven heuristics are used to drive computational kernels on XPU hardware, then computational performance is improved, but thermal efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational performanceVSAvoidthermal efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms that monitor thermal state and energy metrics in real-time. Based on this feedback, the system adjusts kernel selection to maintain thermal efficiency while meeting performance requirements, resolving the contradiction between computational performance and thermal efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adapts kernel selection based on runtime thermal conditions. When thermal state indicates overheating or high power consumption, the system switches to more thermally efficient kernels, thereby resolving the contradiction between performance and thermal efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Use of energy by moving object

If energy-related metrics are considered in kernel assignment, then power efficiency and thermal efficiency are improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a universal kernel selection mechanism that handles multiple objectives (performance, energy efficiency, thermal efficiency) through a single integrated framework. This multi-functional approach manages system complexity by providing a unified solution rather than separate mechanisms for each objective

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Loss of energy

If energy-related metrics are considered in kernel assignment, then total cost of ownership is reduced, but computational performance may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetotal cost of ownershipVSAvoidcomputational performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically balances energy efficiency and performance based on runtime conditions. When performance requirements are critical, the system selects high-performance kernels; when energy efficiency is prioritized, it selects energy-efficient kernels. This dynamic balancing resolves the contradiction between reducing total cost of ownership and maintaining computational performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20220326991A1Apparatus, Device, Method and Computer Program for Controlling the Execution of a Computer Program by a Computer System
Publication Date: 2022.10.13 INTEL CORP
  • US20220326991A1 patent drawing
  • US20220326991A1 patent drawing
  • US20220326991A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Examples relate to an apparatus, a device, a method, and a computer program for controlling the execution of a computer program by a computer system comprising two or more different Processing Units (XPUs), and to a corresponding computer system. The apparatus comprises processing circuitry configured to obtain the computer program, wherein at least a portion of the computer program is based on one or more compute kernels to be executed by the two or more different XPUs. The processing circuitry is configured to determine, for each XPU, an energy-related metric for executing the one or more compute kernels on the respective XPU. The processing circuitry is configured to assign the execution of the one or more compute kernels to the two or more different XPUs based on the respective energy-related metric.