Coordinated Uplink Transmission for XR User Equipment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wireless communication systems face challenges in coordinating transmissions among user equipment (UEs) in extended reality (XR) applications, particularly in ensuring timely and efficient data exchange to maintain immersive experiences.

Innovation Solution

A method and system where a first WTRU (anchor UE) receives configuration information for UTRUs in a group, determines timing information, and selects configured grants (CGs) based on threshold values, then indicates the selected CGs and UTRU IDs to the network to facilitate coordinated transmissions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If coordinated transmissions are implemented among UEs in XR applications, then the quality and reliability of immersive experiences are improved, but the complexity of transmission coordination and resource allocation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality and reliability of immersive experiencesVSAvoidcomplexity of transmission coordination
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The network entity acts as an intermediary to receive timing information from multiple UEs, determine appropriate configured grants, and allocate resources centrally. This mediator approach coordinates transmissions among UEs without requiring direct complex coordination between each UE pair, thus improving reliability while managing complexity through centralized control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts timing information parameters (such as timing offsets and thresholds) to optimize transmission coordination. By changing these parameters based on network conditions and UE requirements, the system improves immersion quality while maintaining manageable coordination complexity through parameter optimization rather than structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If timing information is collected and processed for multiple UEs, then transmission coordination is improved, but the processing time and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission coordinationVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The network entity collects timing information from multiple UEs in advance before making transmission coordination decisions. This preliminary collection of timing data allows the network to prepare and determine appropriate configured grants proactively, reducing last-minute processing delays and improving overall transmission coordination efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Each UE autonomously determines its own timing information based on local measurements and reports it to the network. This self-service approach at the UE level reduces the computational burden on the network, as each UE performs initial timing analysis independently before the network consolidates and makes final coordination decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If configured grants are selected and allocated dynamically, then resource allocation efficiency is improved, but the signaling overhead and network load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation efficiencyVSAvoidsignaling overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The configured grant mechanism serves multiple functions simultaneously: it allocates uplink resources, coordinates timing among multiple UEs, and manages transmission schedules. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate signaling for each function, thereby improving resource allocation efficiency while minimizing additional signaling overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system reuses and recycles configured grant allocations across different UEs and time periods. Once a configured grant is determined and allocated, it can be applied to multiple transmissions and UEs, reducing the need for continuous new grant signaling. This recovery and reuse approach improves resource allocation efficiency while reducing ongoing signaling overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Data Source

PatentUS20250159674A1METHODS, APPARATUS, AND SYSTEMS FOR SUPPORTING COORDINATED TRANSMISSIONS FOR COLLABORATIVE USER EQUIPMENT (UEs)
Publication Date: 2025.05.15 INTERDIGITAL PATENT HOLDINGS INC
  • US20250159674A1 patent drawing
  • US20250159674A1 patent drawing
  • US20250159674A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, apparatus, and systems are disclosed. In one method, a first WTRU of a WTRU group receives configuration information indicating WTRU IDs for one or more WTRUs in the WTRU group, one or more configured grants (CGs) associated with the one or more WTRUs, and a threshold value. The method may further include, on condition that the first WTRU determines that respective timing information associated with a respective one of the one or more WTRUs is above the threshold value, determining for the respective WTRU a respective preferred CG and indicating the respective preferred CG and WTRU ID of the respective WTRU to the network.