X-ray Detector EMI Compensation Algorithm Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Digital X-ray imaging systems face challenges in correcting electromagnetic interference (EMI) artifacts, which distort image data and hinder diagnostic accuracy and computer-assisted analysis.

Innovation Solution

The system acquires and characterizes EMI data, selects appropriate compensation algorithms, and processes X-ray imaging data to produce artifact-free images, using methods such as adjusting integration time and reordering scan lines to minimize EMI effects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If digital detectors are used to acquire X-ray images, then image acquisition capability and diagnostic information are improved, but electromagnetic interference artifacts appear in the images

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage acquisition capabilityVSAvoidelectromagnetic interference artifacts
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary characterization of EMI artifacts by acquiring additional data (such as reference images or EMI-only frames) before final image reconstruction. This allows the system to pre-identify EMI patterns, frequencies, and amplitudes, which are then used to guide the selection and application of appropriate compensation algorithms during the main imaging process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary processing layer between raw detector data and final reconstructed images. This intermediary layer includes EMI characterization modules that analyze the acquired data to identify EMI components, and compensation algorithm selectors that choose appropriate correction methods. This intermediary processing effectively mediates between the harmful EMI artifacts and the final image quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If EMI compensation algorithms are applied to reduce artifacts, then image quality is improved, but processing complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts processing parameters based on the characterized EMI properties. Instead of applying fixed complex algorithms to all images, the system changes processing parameters (such as filter strength, compensation intensity, or algorithm selection) based on the detected EMI frequency, amplitude, and pattern. This adaptive approach maintains image quality while reducing unnecessary processing complexity for images with minimal EMI.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements self-service by automatically characterizing EMI artifacts and selecting appropriate compensation algorithms without requiring manual intervention. The EMI characterization module autonomously analyzes the acquired data, identifies EMI components, and triggers the selection and application of suitable compensation algorithms, thereby simplifying the overall process despite the underlying computational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple compensation algorithms are available for different EMI types, then adaptability to various interference patterns is improved, but algorithm selection complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to EMI typesVSAvoidalgorithm selection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs feedback mechanisms where the EMI characterization results directly inform algorithm selection. The characterization module continuously monitors EMI patterns and provides feedback to the algorithm selector, which then chooses the most appropriate compensation algorithm based on the current EMI conditions. This closed-loop feedback system enables high adaptability to different EMI types while automating the selection process to avoid manual complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system extracts and separates the EMI characterization function from the main image reconstruction process. By creating a dedicated EMI characterization module that operates independently, the system can identify EMI patterns and select appropriate algorithms without complicating the core reconstruction workflow. This extraction allows multiple compensation algorithms to be available while keeping the selection logic isolated and manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS8693747B2Radiological image noise reduction system and method
Publication Date: 2014.04.08 GE PRECISION HEALTHCARE LLC
  • US8693747B2 patent drawing
  • US8693747B2 patent drawing
  • US8693747B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for controlling a X-ray radiography system includes acquiring data from a digital X-ray detector, characterizing electromagnetic interference based upon the acquired data, selecting an electromagnetic interference compensation algorithm based upon the characterized electromagnetic interference, acquiring X-ray imaging data via the digital X-ray detector based upon the selected electromagnetic interference compensation algorithm, and processing the X-ray imaging data to produce image data capable of reconstruction in a user viewable form.