Counting X-ray Detector Missing Pixel Interpolation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Counting X-ray detectors face challenges in achieving high-quality images due to their modular structure, which results in discontinuities, reduced efficiency at the edges, and increased noise, particularly because of missing pixels and the limited active surface area of edge pixels, leading to suboptimal signal-to-noise ratios.

Innovation Solution

A method for generating X-ray images using a counting X-ray detector with a uniform matrix structure, where missing pixels are corrected by interpolating and extrapolating signal data from surrounding pixels, and adjusting signal responses to achieve uniformity, thereby improving image quality and reducing noise.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If a modular structure with multiple detector modules is used to achieve large surface area, then the detector can cover a larger area, but discontinuities and missing pixels occur at the edges and joints

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetector surface areaVSAvoidpixel uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The detector is divided into multiple detector modules that can be arranged in different configurations (one-dimensional array, two-dimensional array, or radial arrangement around the isocenter) to achieve the required large surface area while maintaining manageable module sizes for fabrication

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different correction strategies are applied to different regions: edge pixels receive specific correction for their reduced active surface area, missing pixels are reconstructed using interpolation from surrounding pixels, and the correction factors are position-dependent to account for local variations in the modular structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Area of stationary object

If detector modules are arranged adjacently to form a uniform matrix, then coverage area increases, but edge pixels have reduced active surface area leading to lower signal-to-noise ratio

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetector coverage areaVSAvoidsignal-to-noise ratio
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

Position-dependent correction factors are calculated and applied specifically to edge pixels to compensate for their reduced active surface area. The correction takes into account the specific geometric location of each pixel relative to module boundaries, restoring the signal-to-noise ratio to match that of central pixels

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The correction factors are determined as a function of position parameters (distance from module edges, angle relative to isocenter for radial arrangements), allowing the system to adapt the signal correction dynamically based on the pixel's location within the modular detector array

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If missing pixels are present in the detector matrix, then module assembly becomes feasible, but image quality deteriorates due to gaps in image data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodule assembly feasibilityVSAvoidimage data completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

Missing pixel values are reconstructed by creating copies of data from surrounding existing pixels through interpolation algorithms. The signal from neighboring pixels is combined and weighted to generate estimated values for the missing positions, effectively copying and reconstructing the image information that would have been captured by the missing pixels

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

Correction factors for missing pixels are pre-calculated based on the known detector geometry and module arrangement. During image acquisition, these pre-computed factors are applied to rapidly reconstruct the missing data without requiring complex real-time processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach results in improved image quality by correcting for design-related errors and enhancing signal-to-noise ratios, providing a more accurate and detailed X-ray image despite the modular structure's limitations.

Implementation Method 1

X-ray radiation is converted in the direct converter (e.g., CdTe or CZT), and the generated charge carrier pairs are separated via an electrical field

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric effect: Photoelectric Effect

Implementation Method 2

the generated charge carrier pairs are separated via an electrical field that is generated by a common top electrode and a pixel electrode

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical field separation: Electric Field

Data Source

PatentUS10448914B2X-ray image generation
Publication Date: 2019.10.22 SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG
  • US10448914B2 patent drawing
  • US10448914B2 patent drawing
  • US10448914B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Generation of an X-ray image of an object using a counting X-ray detector is provided. The X-ray detector includes detector modules that may be aligned adjacent to one another. Each of the detector modules is subdivided into a matrix having a plurality of pixels. The detector modules are arranged adjacent to one another on a common substrate. A sensor surface formed by the detector modules has a uniform matrix structure having a constant pixel pitch. At least one missing pixel is arranged within the sensor surface. Raw image data is acquired by a portion of the detector modules of the X-ray detector, the acquired raw image data is at least partially corrected, and further raw image data is calculated for the at least one missing pixel using the corrected raw image data. The X-ray image is calculated based on the corrected raw image data and the further raw image data.