X-ray Detector Spatial Response Signature Determination

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Computed radiography (CR) systems face diagnostic image quality loss due to local sensitivity variability in x-ray detectors, which introduces noise and reduces Detective Quantum Efficiency (DQE), making it difficult to discern subtle information and potentially hiding pathology.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for determining the spatial response signature of a photo-stimulable phosphor detector by generating flat field images, applying low-pass filtering, demodulating pixel values, and spatially registering multiple images to minimize angular differences, allowing for the extraction of medium to high spatial frequency components of detector sensitivity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If multiple flat field images are processed to determine spatial response signature, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespatial response signature determination accuracyVSAvoidimage processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the spatial response signature determination into distinct processing steps: generating multiple flat field images, spatially registering them using reference image selection with minimal angular difference, filtering to extract spatial frequency components, and computing the signature. This segmentation makes the complex measurement process manageable and systematic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by selecting a reference flat field image before spatial registration based on minimal angular difference criteria. This pre-selection optimizes the registration process and improves the accuracy of spatial response signature determination without requiring complex real-time adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If spatial warping with reference image selection is applied, then manufacturing precision is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespatial registration accuracyVSAvoidimage processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by selecting only the most suitable reference image from multiple flat field images based on angular difference criteria, rather than processing all possible image combinations. This reduces processing time while maintaining sufficient registration accuracy for determining spatial response signature.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If detector sensitivity variability is measured and compensated, then image quality is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidquality control system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service by enabling the detector system to automatically characterize its own spatial response signature through processing flat field images. This self-characterization capability allows the system to compensate for its own sensitivity variability without requiring external calibration equipment or complex external quality control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Measurement precision

If medium to high spatial frequency components are extracted, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of information increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespatial frequency characterization accuracyVSAvoidimage information
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the extraction principle by isolating and analyzing only the medium to high spatial frequency components of the flat field images to determine the spatial response signature. This selective extraction focuses the measurement on the relevant frequency range that characterizes detector sensitivity variability, while low-frequency components are handled separately through spatial registration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach improves image quality and DQE by removing detector-related noise, enabling more representative quality control testing and compensating for detector wear, thus enhancing detection capabilities and maintaining image quality over time.

Implementation Method 1

a two dimensional x-ray detector comprising a photostimulable phosphor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhoto-stimulation: Photoluminescence

Implementation Method 2

scanning the homogeneously exposed detector

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotostimulated luminescence: Photoluminescence

Data Source

PatentUS8913813B2Method of determining spatial response signature of detector in computed radiography
Publication Date: 2014.12.16 AGFA NV
  • US8913813B2 patent drawing
  • US8913813B2 patent drawing
  • US8913813B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Method and system for determining the spatial response signature of a x-ray detector comprising a photostimulable phosphor by generating a flat field image of the detector, generating a low-pass filtered version of the flat field image and background demodulating the flat field image by pixel-wise dividing it by means of corresponding pixel values in the low-pass filtered version.