X-ray Metrology Parameter Optimization for Semiconductor Structures

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional x-ray metrology tools face challenges in measuring complex semiconductor structures due to limited adaptability, precision, and time efficiency, particularly with small-scale, opaque materials, and high-aspect ratio three-dimensional geometries, leading to difficulties in resolving critical parameters like line edge roughness and line width roughness.

Innovation Solution

The optimization of x-ray metrology system parameters through iterative refinement of machine settings, such as angle of incidence, beam energy, and measurement duration, using statistical filters like Kalman filters, to enhance precision, accuracy, and reduce measurement time, while minimizing parameter correlation and computation time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional x-ray metrology tools use fixed measurement system configurations, then the system is simple to operate, but the system lacks adaptability to measure complex semiconductor structures with diverse geometries and materials

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to measurement system configurationsVSAvoidmeasurement system configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adaptability by enabling the x-ray metrology system to automatically adjust measurement configurations based on the specific target structure being measured. The system dynamically selects appropriate illumination angles, detector positions, and measurement parameters rather than requiring manual configuration for each measurement type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes measurement parameters such as x-ray illumination angles, detector distances, and measurement durations based on the characteristics of the target structure. This allows the same physical system to adapt to different measurement scenarios by modifying operational parameters rather than requiring physical reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If the measurement system uses a broader range of system parameter values to improve measurement precision, then measurement accuracy improves, but measurement time becomes excessively long

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement precisionVSAvoidmeasurement time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary characterization of the target structure using initial measurements or simulation data before conducting the full measurement sequence. This preliminary action allows the system to pre-determine optimal measurement parameters and focus measurements only on the most informative configurations, reducing total measurement time while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces exhaustive physical measurement sampling with computational simulation and modeling to identify optimal measurement configurations. By using simulations to predict which measurement parameters will provide the most information, the system avoids performing unnecessary measurements, thereby reducing measurement time while maintaining or improving precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If evenly spaced angle sampling is used for periodic targets, then the measurement setup is simple, but the system cannot resolve particular parameters of interest with sufficient precision

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter resolution precisionVSAvoidmeasurement configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by concentrating measurement sampling density in specific angular regions where the measurement signal is most sensitive to the parameters of interest. Rather than uniform sampling, the system performs measurements at non-uniformly spaced angles that are optimized for the specific target structure and measurement objectives, improving parameter resolution where it matters most.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extends the measurement approach from simple angular sampling to multi-dimensional parameter space optimization, considering combinations of illumination angles, detector positions, and measurement energies simultaneously. This allows the system to resolve parameters that cannot be decoupled with single-parameter variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Reliability

If multiple measurement parameters are varied to improve measurement accuracy, then parameter decoupling improves, but the number of measurements and computation time increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter decoupling reliabilityVSAvoidmeasurement throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary simulation-based analysis to identify which measurement parameter combinations will provide the most information for decoupling the parameters of interest. This preliminary action allows the system to select a minimal set of measurements that achieve reliable parameter decoupling without requiring exhaustive sampling of all possible parameter combinations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses computational optimization and simulation to replace exhaustive physical measurement campaigns. By using models to predict parameter correlations and measurement information content, the system can determine the minimal measurement set required for reliable decoupling, significantly reducing both measurement and computation time while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables more precise and accurate measurement of structural and material characteristics in semiconductor fabrication, improving the ability to resolve complex parameters and reducing measurement time, thereby addressing the limitations of traditional x-ray metrology systems.

Implementation Method 1

x-ray based metrology system to collect measurement data associated with measurements of one or more target structures

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectX-ray scattering: Scattering

Data Source

PatentUS10324050B2Measurement system optimization for X-ray based metrology
Publication Date: 2019.06.18 KLA CORP
  • US10324050B2 patent drawing
  • US10324050B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for optimizing measurement system parameter settings of an x-ray based metrology system are presented. X-ray based metrology systems employing an optimized set of measurement system parameters are used to measure structural, material, and process characteristics associated with different semiconductor fabrication processes with greater precision and accuracy. In one aspect, a set of values of one or more machine parameters that specify a measurement scenario is refined based at least in part on a sensitivity of measurement data to a previous set of values of the one or more machine parameters. The refinement of the values of the machine parameters is performed to maximize precision, maximize accuracy, minimize correlation between parameters of interest, or any combination thereof. Refinement of the machine parameter values that specify a measurement scenario can be used to optimize the measurement recipe to reduce measurement time and increase measurement precision and accuracy.