X-ray Phase Imaging Subject Holder Resin Material

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing X-ray phase imaging apparatuses face challenges in reducing artifacts caused by metal components like the subject holder, rotation mechanism, and direction changing mechanism, which scatter X-rays and degrade image quality, especially when trying to rotate subjects with carbon fibers to optimize carbon fiber detection.

Innovation Solution

The X-ray phase imaging apparatus incorporates a subject holder made of a material with higher X-ray transmittance than metal and lower X-ray scattering, allowing it to be placed within the X-ray irradiation area without significantly degrading image quality. This design also includes a first rotation mechanism that can rotate the subject holder by at least 180 degrees, increasing the angular range for subject rotation and improving image capture.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a metal subject holder is used in the X-ray irradiation area, then the structural strength and rigidity are sufficient, but X-ray scattering occurs causing artifacts that degrade image quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidX-ray scattering artifacts
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material parameter of the subject holder from metal to resin, which has different X-ray interaction properties. This parameter change reduces X-ray scattering and absorption, thereby minimizing artifacts in the captured images while maintaining sufficient mechanical strength for holding the subject during rotation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs resin material as a composite alternative to metal for the subject holder. This material selection balances mechanical requirements (strength and rigidity to hold the subject) with radiological requirements (low X-ray scattering and absorption), resolving the contradiction between structural reliability and image quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Adaptability or versatility

If the direction changing mechanism rotates the subject along a quarter-circle arc frame, then the mechanism can be prevented from appearing on the image, but the angular rotation range is limited to 90 degrees

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveangular rotation rangeVSAvoidmechanism appearance on image causing artifacts
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a second rotation mechanism that enables rotation about an axis orthogonal to the first rotation axis. This dimensional addition allows the subject to be oriented in multiple directions (including aligning carbon fibers with the grating) without requiring the direction changing mechanism to appear in the X-ray path, thus expanding the effective angular range beyond 90 degrees.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent divides the rotation function into two independent rotation mechanisms: one for rotating the subject holder about a horizontal axis, and another for rotating the entire assembly about a vertical axis. This segmentation allows each mechanism to operate independently within its optimal range while achieving a combined multi-axis rotation capability that exceeds the limitations of a single arc-frame mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Manufacturing precision

If metal components are used in the rotation mechanism, then mechanical strength and precision are sufficient, but X-ray scattering from these components degrades image quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotation precisionVSAvoidimage quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material composition of the rotation mechanism components that are positioned within the X-ray irradiation area, replacing metal parts with resin parts. This parameter change maintains the necessary mechanical precision for rotation while significantly reducing X-ray scattering and absorption, thereby improving image quality without sacrificing rotational accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The use of a non-metallic subject holder reduces artifacts in captured images and allows for a broader range of subject rotation, enhancing the ability to precisely image the internal structure of subjects like carbon fiber reinforced plastics.

Implementation Method 1

the subject holder is formed of a first material having an X-ray transmittance greater than metal and an X-ray scattering degree smaller than the metal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectX-ray transmittance: Absorption (EM radiation)

Implementation Method 2

an X-ray scattering degree smaller than the metal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectX-ray scattering: Scattering

Implementation Method 3

a plurality of gratings arranged between the X-ray source and the X-ray detector, and including a first grating to be irradiated with X-rays by the X-ray source and a second grating to be irradiated with the X-rays from the first grating

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectX-ray diffraction: Diffraction

Data Source

PatentUS12292393B2X-ray phase imaging apparatus
Publication Date: 2025.05.06 SHIMADZU CORP
  • US12292393B2 patent drawing
  • US12292393B2 patent drawing
  • US12292393B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An X-ray phase imaging apparatus includes an X-ray source; an X-ray detector; a plurality of gratings; a subject holder arranged in an X-ray irradiation area and configured to hold the subject; and an image processor configured to generate an X-ray phase contrast image based on an intensity distribution of the X-rays detected by the X-ray detector. The subject holder is formed of a first material having an X-ray transmittance greater than metal and a scattering degree smaller than the metal.