X-ray Image Quality Control via Automated Defect Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current X-ray image quality control systems are subjective and rely on manual operation, lacking standardized detection for positioning errors and exposure issues, and do not provide timely feedback for technicians to adjust image acquisition.

Innovation Solution

An automated X-ray image quality control system that includes an image acquisition unit, a quality detection unit using machine learning algorithms to detect defects, and a feedback unit to provide real-time adjustments, segmenting images into bone, soft tissue, and background regions for comprehensive quality evaluation and defect identification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated image quality assurance system is implemented, then productivity is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates due to lack of specialized image quality standards and inability to identify body parts, tissues or bone structures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage quality control efficiencyVSAvoidimage quality detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the image analysis process into multiple specialized modules: body part identification module, tissue structure recognition module, exposure quality assessment module, and artifact detection module. Each module focuses on specific detection tasks with dedicated algorithms and standards, enabling comprehensive quality control while maintaining high precision for each specific measurement task.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary layer of automated analysis between image acquisition and final quality assessment. This intermediary includes AI-based body part recognition, anatomical structure identification, and preliminary quality screening that bridges the gap between raw images and expert evaluation, providing standardized measurements while preserving diagnostic accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If cloud service is used for image quality assessment, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time increases due to upload and processing delays

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage quality assessment accuracyVSAvoidfeedback time to technicians
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary image quality assessment, body part identification, and anomaly detection locally at the acquisition device before images are transmitted to cloud servers. This preliminary processing provides immediate feedback to technicians while more comprehensive cloud-based analysis follows asynchronously, reducing the critical feedback time without sacrificing assessment thoroughness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a hybrid architecture that operates on multiple dimensions: local real-time processing for immediate feedback, and cloud-based batch processing for comprehensive analysis. This multi-dimensional approach allows simultaneous delivery of quick preliminary results and detailed precision assessments without the trade-off present in single-dimension systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Measurement precision

If manual quality control by technicians is used, then measurement precision is improved through professional experience, but productivity deteriorates due to subjective and time-consuming manual operation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage quality evaluation accuracyVSAvoidimage quality control speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service automated quality control that performs body part identification, image quality assessment, and defect detection without requiring manual technician intervention for routine evaluations. The automated system serves itself by continuously monitoring and evaluating images, freeing technicians from repetitive tasks while maintaining consistent quality standards through standardized algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces the mechanical manual evaluation process with automated computational analysis. AI algorithms substitute for human visual inspection in detecting exposure issues, artifacts, and anatomical correctness, while preserving the expertise of technicians by using their guidelines to train and validate the automated detection systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11478208B2X-ray image quality control system
Publication Date: 2022.10.25 CARESTREAM HEALTH INC
  • US11478208B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An X-ray image quality control system includes an image acquisition unit configured to acquire an X-ray image and determine the type of imaged body part and the type of projection mode. A quality detection unit is configured to detect an image defect in X-ray image with regard to the type of the imaged body part and/or the type of the projection mode. The quality control system effectively identifies image defects including inaccurate positioning, patient movement, external object artifacts, and poor exposure. The system provides feedback to the technician at the image acquisition point to adjust the image acquisition solution in a timely manner.