X-Ray Scatterometry Decomposition for High-Aspect Ratio Metrology

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current metrology systems face challenges in accurately measuring complex, high-aspect ratio semiconductor structures due to limitations in penetration depth and sensitivity, especially with optical methods, which struggle with opaque materials and three-dimensional geometries, leading to biased and inaccurate results.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of X-Ray scatterometry measurement systems that decompose complex structures into simpler sub-structures and measurement areas, allowing for independent simulation and modeling of scattering responses to enhance measurement accuracy and reduce the influence of incidental structures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If optical scatterometry is used to measure complex high-aspect ratio structures, then non-destructive measurement is achieved, but penetration depth and sensitivity are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement accuracyVSAvoidpenetration depth
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex measurement problem into two parts: (1) using optical scatterometry for non-destructive surface measurement, and (2) using destructive cross-sectional preparation for deep internal structure measurement. This segmentation allows each method to be applied where it is most effective, resolving the contradiction between non-destructive capability and penetration depth.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces cross-sectional preparation as an intermediary step that bridges the gap between optical measurement limitations and the need for deep structure characterization. By preparing physical cross-sections, the system enables transmission electron microscopy to measure internal structures that optical methods cannot penetrate, while still maintaining process correlation through the use of identical target structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Length of moving object

If complex three-dimensional structures are measured with optical radiation, then depth penetration is improved, but sensitivity to small anomalies is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedepth penetrationVSAvoidsensitivity to small anomalies
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from three-dimensional optical measurement to two-dimensional cross-sectional measurement. By preparing thin cross-sectional samples and measuring them in transmission electron microscopy, the system achieves both deep penetration (through the thin section) and high sensitivity (to nanoscale features in the cross-section), resolving the contradiction between depth and sensitivity in 3D measurement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Loss of information

If multiple parameters are used to characterize complex structures, then measurement completeness is improved, but parameter correlation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement completenessVSAvoidparameter decoupling
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces optical measurement methods with transmission electron microscopy for cross-sectional measurement. TEM provides direct imaging of internal structures with high resolution, allowing multiple parameters (layer thicknesses, material compositions, structural dimensions) to be measured simultaneously with high accuracy and minimal parameter correlation, as each parameter can be directly observed and measured independently in the cross-sectional view.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Measurement precision

If destructive sample preparation is performed to achieve deep structure measurement, then measurement accuracy is improved, but measurement time and process complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeep structure measurement accuracyVSAvoidsample preparation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs cross-sectional preparation in advance on dedicated target structures that are fabricated alongside the device structures. These pre-prepared cross-sections can then be stored and measured later using transmission electron microscopy, allowing deep structure measurement without adding time to the critical device fabrication process. The preliminary action of preparing targets in advance decouples the measurement time from the fabrication timeline.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables more efficient and accurate measurement of high-aspect ratio structures by improving sensitivity and reducing parameter correlation, thereby increasing device yield and reducing the need for destructive sample preparation.

Implementation Method 1

an x-ray illumination source configured to emit an amount of x-ray illumination light

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectX-ray radiation: X-Ray

Implementation Method 2

an amount of x-ray light reflected from or transmitted through the semiconductor wafer is detected

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectScattering: Scattering

Data Source

PatentUS10983227B2On-device metrology using target decomposition
Publication Date: 2021.04.20 KLA CORP
  • US10983227B2 patent drawing
  • US10983227B2 patent drawing
  • US10983227B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for more efficient X-Ray scatterometry measurements of on-device structures are presented herein. X-Ray scatterometry measurements of one or more structures over a measurement area includes a decomposition of the one or more structures into a plurality of sub-structures, a decomposition of the measurement area into a plurality of sub-areas, or both. The decomposed structures, measurement areas, or both, are independently simulated. The scattering contributions of each of the independently simulated decomposed structures are combined to simulate the actual scattering of the measured structures within the measurement area. In a further aspect, measured intensities and modelled intensities including one or more incidental structures are employed to perform measurement of structures of interest. In other further aspects, measurement decomposition is employed to train a measurement model and to optimize a measurement recipe for a particular measurement application.