XRF Analyzer Automated Calibration Rods

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing XRF analyzers require frequent manual calibration and quality assurance testing, which is time-consuming and necessitates the instrument to be offline, making continuous monitoring unreliable and prone to inaccuracies.

Innovation Solution

An XRF analyzer system that includes calibration rods of known composition above and/or below the filter tape, allowing for automated quality assurance testing and energy calibration, with the x-ray source hitting these rods to generate and detect reflected x-rays for accuracy and precision verification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual calibration and quality assurance testing are performed frequently, then measurement accuracy and precision are improved, but instrument downtime and loss of productivity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement accuracyVSAvoidinstrument availability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The instrument performs self-calibration using built-in calibration rods that are automatically positioned and analyzed by the XRF system. The quality assurance testing is also automated, allowing the instrument to verify its own performance without external intervention, thereby eliminating downtime while maintaining measurement accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Calibration rods of known composition are pre-installed in the instrument's analysis zone, allowing calibration to be performed continuously without requiring external calibration standards to be brought in during operation. This preliminary preparation enables automated, ongoing calibration that maintains accuracy without interrupting productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If manual calibration is performed, then measurement accuracy is improved, but time consumption and operational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalibration accuracyVSAvoidcalibration time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The manual mechanical process of positioning calibration standards and performing quality assurance tests is replaced with an automated system that electronically controls the analysis of calibration rods. The instrument automatically positions, analyzes, and adjusts calibration parameters without manual intervention, significantly reducing time consumption while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors measurement quality using built-in quality assurance testing and automatically adjusts calibration parameters based on the analysis of calibration rods. This feedback mechanism enables continuous, real-time calibration without requiring manual intervention or extensive time for verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If the instrument remains online for continuous monitoring, then productivity is improved, but reliability of QA data decreases due to inability to perform manual calibration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous monitoring capabilityVSAvoidQA data accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The instrument performs self-calibration and self-verification using built-in calibration rods and automated quality assurance testing while operating online. This self-service capability maintains continuous monitoring productivity while ensuring QA data reliability through automated verification of measurement accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The calibration and quality assurance testing processes are integrated into continuous operation, allowing the instrument to perform calibration and verification activities without taking the instrument offline. This continuous action maintains both productivity and reliability by eliminating interruptions to monitoring while ensuring ongoing calibration accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables continuous, automated quality assurance and energy calibration, ensuring reliable and accurate results without the need for frequent offline manual calibration, thereby enhancing the instrument's reliability and compliance with regulatory standards.

Implementation Method 1

High energy x-rays are emitted from the x-ray source onto the sample to be analyzed. When the high energy x-rays hit the sample, new x-rays of differing energies are produced that are detected by the detector.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectX-ray fluorescence: Fluorescence

Implementation Method 2

The x-ray source hits one or both of the calibration rods and the reflected x-rays are detected by the x-ray detector.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectX-ray reflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS7539282B2XRF analyzer
Publication Date: 2009.05.26 SAILBRI COOPER INC
  • US7539282B2 patent drawing
  • US7539282B2 patent drawing
  • US7539282B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of analyzing a fluid sample by XRF includes the steps of: depositing the fluid sample onto a substrate, exposing the sample and the substrate to an x-ray emission, generating a first analytical signal responsive to the x-ray emission, providing an operable first reference material having a first extended position above the substrate and in communication with the x-ray emission, periodically extending the first reference material to its first extended position, generating a first calibration signal, providing an operable second reference material having a first extended position below the substrate and in communication with the x-ray emission, and periodically extending the second reference material to its first extended position and generating at least one second calibration signal. The first and second calibration signals are compared with predetermined values. The first and second reference materials also have second retracted positions.