Removable XRF Window Film Assembly for Sensitivity and Protection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

X-ray fluorescence (XRF) testing instruments face challenges in protecting their windows from harsh environments without compromising sensitivity, particularly for elements with low atomic numbers, as existing protective materials either impede accuracy or lack sufficient physical protection.

Innovation Solution

A removable and re-attachable protective film is applied to the detector window using adhesive or magnetic means, allowing for the use of different materials like polyethylene for low atomic number testing and polyimide for higher atomic numbers, with calibration modes to adjust for the added film's energy-dependent effects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If polyethylene is used for window shields, then transparency to low energy X-rays is improved, but resistance to punctures deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransparency to low energy X-raysVSAvoidresistance to punctures
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The protective window system is segmented into multiple independent film layers that can be applied separately. A thin polyethylene film provides X-ray transparency for low atomic number element detection, while a separate polyimide film provides mechanical strength and puncture resistance. This segmentation allows each layer to optimize its specific function without compromising the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses composite material construction by combining polyethylene and polyimide films in a layered configuration. The polyethylene layer contributes low X-ray absorption characteristics, while the polyimide layer contributes high mechanical strength. Together, they form a composite protective window that achieves both optical transparency and mechanical durability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If thicker polyimide is used for physical protection, then resistance to punctures is improved, but sensitivity for low atomic number elements deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephysical protectionVSAvoidsensitivity for low atomic number elements
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using a single thick polyimide layer, the protection is segmented into a thin polyimide film for mechanical strength and a separate thin polyethylene film for X-ray transparency. This segmentation allows the polyethylene layer to compensate for the X-ray absorption of the polyimide layer, maintaining sensitivity for low atomic number elements while providing adequate physical protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the protective window system have different material properties optimized for specific functions. The polyethylene portion provides local optimization for X-ray transmission, while the polyimide portion provides local optimization for mechanical protection. This local quality differentiation resolves the contradiction between overall strength and local transparency requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Adaptability or versatility

If a removable protective film is applied, then adaptability for different testing requirements is improved, but device complexity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability for different testing requirementsVSAvoidease of film application and removal
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The protective films are pre-cut to match the exact dimensions and shape of the detector window. This preliminary preparation ensures that the films fit perfectly without requiring complex alignment procedures during application. The pre-cut design simplifies the user's task to merely attaching the pre-prepared film to the window surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The protective films are designed as disposable, low-cost components that can be easily applied and removed without requiring complex installation mechanisms. Each film is inexpensive enough that it can be replaced routinely, allowing users to switch between different film types (polyethylene, polyimide, or no film) based on testing requirements without investing in complex adjustable mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution provides a cost-effective, easy-to-apply protection that maintains sensitivity for low atomic number testing while offering physical protection for higher atomic numbers, enhancing the versatility and reliability of XRF instruments.

Implementation Method 1

The protective covering or guard film may be attached on top of the detector window by adhesive means

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesion: Adhesive

Implementation Method 2

Other means of attaching, removing and re-attaching can include using other coupling means, such as magnetic coupling

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic coupling: Magnetism

Implementation Method 3

Polyethylene is more transparent and therefore less of absorbing to low energy X-rays than polyimide

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectX-ray absorption: Absorption (EM radiation)

Implementation Method 4

but is not as resistant to punctures

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical strength:

Data Source

PatentUS10024811B2XRF instrument with removably attached window protecting film assembly
Publication Date: 2018.07.17 EVIDENT SCIENTIFIC INC
  • US10024811B2 patent drawing
  • US10024811B2 patent drawing
  • US10024811B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Herein disclosed is an x-ray florescence (XRF) test system which comprises an XRF test instrument used for testing a test target's responses to X-rays, the instrument including a test window allowing the X-ray and its responsive energy to pass through, and a window protecting film assembly allowing X-rays to pass through and providing protection to the window, the film assembly being configured to be coupled with the window in a fashion to be removed from or applied or reapplied over the window. The corresponding calibration mode can be manually or automatically applied according to the specific film assembly presently in use. An embodiment of the film assembly comprises a thin film fixed with an adhesive layer to a supporting frame having a closely spaced array of apertures.