Yarn Tuft Transfer System with Articulated Linkage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing attachment systems for belts and chains in transfer systems are not stable and do not provide accurate or repeatable positioning, especially when loading a payload, as they rely on belt tension and can lead to localized stretching and inaccurate positioning.

Innovation Solution

A yarn tuft transfer system with a functional link element and two securing means, one rotatable about a first axis and the other about a second axis, spaced apart, allowing for precise positioning and resistance to forces and moments, utilizing an articulated linkage with clamps that trap the belt for stability and accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single attachment point is used on the belt, then the device complexity is reduced, but the stability and positioning accuracy deteriorate because it relies on belt tension and flexes easily under load

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattachment structureVSAvoidattachment stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The attachment device is divided into multiple attachment points (at least two) spaced apart on the belt, with each point providing independent securing. This segmentation distributes the load and prevents flexing, achieving stable positioning without requiring overly complex single-point mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The attachment system incorporates rotational degrees of freedom with securing means that can rotate about first and second axes perpendicular to each other. This dimensional freedom allows the attachment to accommodate belt tension variations while maintaining stable positioning through geometric constraint rather than rigid fixed connections

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If two attachment points are used close together, then the stability improves over single point, but the positioning accuracy deteriorates because the points are too close to provide precise positioning when loaded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattachment stabilityVSAvoidpositioning accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

Different regions of the attachment device have specialized functions: the first securing means provides rotational freedom about the first axis to handle tension variations, while the second securing means provides rotational freedom about the second axis for fine positioning. This local specialization allows each attachment point to contribute differently to overall stability and precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The attachment system uses dynamic rotational joints rather than fixed rigid connections. The securing means can rotate about perpendicular axes, allowing the structure to adapt dynamically to loading conditions while maintaining precise positioning through controlled degrees of freedom

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If the device width is increased to provide stable attachment, then the positioning accuracy improves, but the belt must be bent to ride around cog rollers which causes localized stretching and inaccurate positioning over time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattachment stabilityVSAvoidpositioning repeatability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of bending the belt to accommodate the attachment width, the attachment device is designed to work with the belt's natural path around cog rollers. The rotational securing means allow the attachment to maintain its width while following the belt's curvature, inverting the conventional approach of forcing the belt to conform to the attachment geometry

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameters of the attachment by introducing rotational degrees of freedom. Rather than maintaining fixed geometric relationships that require belt bending, the attachment points can rotate about perpendicular axes, allowing the system to accommodate varying belt tensions and curvatures while maintaining stable, repeatable positioning

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8186389B2Yarn tuft transfer system
Publication Date: 2012.05.29 CARLYLE STRATEGIC PARTNERS II LUXEMBOURG S A R L
  • US8186389B2 patent drawing
  • US8186389B2 patent drawing
  • US8186389B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A yarn tuft transfer system for a carpet manufacturing machine, including one or more mounting devices secured to a belt or chain. Each mounting device includes a functional link element having a mounting for a payload, first securing device rotatably mounted on the functional link element about a first axis for securing the functional link element onto the belt or chain at a first position, and second for securing the functional link element onto the belt or chain at a second position spaced from the first, the device being rotatable relative to the functional link element about a second axis. The first securing device is moveable relative to the second securing device along a line perpendicular to and intersecting the first and second axes. The system further utilizing a yarn tuft holder mounted on each payload mounting.