Vehicle Yaw Rate Arbitration for Steering Actuator Limits

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle control systems fail to appropriately control lateral movement when the steering actuator cannot realize the intended steering command, leading to unexpected vehicle behavior and reduced responsiveness.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle control device that acquires steering angle and yaw rate as control commands from driving support applications, allowing parallel control of brake or drive actuators to manage lateral movement, even if the steering actuator cannot achieve the desired steering angle, by distributing braking or driving force between wheels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the steering actuator is controlled based on the steering angle from the arbitration unit, then the steering command is executed, but the vehicle lateral movement cannot be appropriately controlled when the steering actuator fails or cannot realize the intended steering angle

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle lateral movement control reliabilityVSAvoidcontrol method flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the control parameter from steering angle (geometric parameter) to yaw rate (dynamic parameter). When the steering actuator cannot achieve the desired steering angle, the arbitration unit switches to controlling the vehicle's yaw rate through differential braking or drive forces, thereby maintaining lateral movement control capability despite steering actuator limitations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The control system segments the lateral movement control function into two independent pathways: steering angle-based control through the steering actuator, and yaw rate-based control through brake/drive actuators. This segmentation allows the system to select the appropriate control pathway based on steering actuator availability and performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Device complexity

If only the steering actuator is used for lateral movement control, then the control system is simple, but the vehicle behavior becomes unexpected when the steering actuator cannot realize the intended steering angle

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoidvehicle behavior predictability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The brake actuators and drive actuators, originally designed for longitudinal vehicle control, are given the additional function of lateral movement control through yaw rate control. This multi-functionality allows the system to maintain lateral control capability even when the steering actuator is unavailable or insufficient

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If the steering angle exceeds the maximum steering angle of the steering actuator, then the arbitration unit can still issue the command, but the actual steering angle deviates from the commanded angle

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearbitration unit operationVSAvoidsteering angle accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback control by continuously monitoring the actual steering angle and comparing it with the commanded steering angle. When the deviation exceeds a threshold or the commanded angle exceeds the maximum steering angle, the arbitration unit detects this discrepancy and switches to yaw rate control mode, using feedback from yaw rate sensors to maintain accurate lateral movement control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP3819193B1Vehicle control device
Publication Date: 2024.08.07 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • EP3819193B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3819193B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3819193B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The vehicle control device includes an arbitration unit (21) configured to arbitrate between a plurality of control commands acquired from a plurality of driving support applications that respectively implements driving support functions, configured to output instructions based on a control command after arbitration to a first control unit (33) that is able to control a steering actuator (43) and a second control unit (31, 32) that is able to control at least one of a brake actuator (42) or a drive actuator (41), and configured to acquire a steering angle and a yaw rate as the control commands from the driving support applications.