Historical Yield Map Clustering for Agricultural Management Zones

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing agricultural management systems fail to effectively delineate management zones within fields based on historical yield data, leading to inefficient crop management practices.

Innovation Solution

A computer system is employed to process historical yield data, applying techniques such as empirical cumulative density transformation, spatial smoothing, and clustering to identify contiguous regions with similar yield-limiting factors, enabling uniform management practices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional uniform management practices are applied across the entire field, then operational simplicity is maintained, but crop productivity and yield are reduced due to ignoring spatial variability in yield-limiting factors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrop productivityVSAvoidmanagement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the agricultural field into multiple management zones based on historical yield data and spatial analysis. Each zone is identified by grouping locations with similar yield patterns and limiting factors, transforming a single uniform management approach into targeted zone-specific management strategies that improve productivity without excessive complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by tailoring management practices to specific zones within the field rather than applying uniform treatment everywhere. Each management zone receives customized recommendations for seeding, irrigation, and nitrogen application based on its unique yield characteristics and limiting factors, optimizing productivity for each local area

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Measurement precision

If management zones are delineated using detailed spatial analysis and clustering algorithms, then management precision is improved, but computational complexity and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvezone delineation precisionVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by using historical yield data from previous growing seasons to pre-identify potential management zones before current season operations begin. This advance analysis allows the system to establish zone boundaries and characteristics in advance, reducing the need for complex real-time processing during active field operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates simplified representations or copies of the complex spatial data through clustering algorithms that group locations with similar yield patterns. These clustered zones serve as simplified models that capture the essential spatial variability without requiring processing of every individual data point, reducing computational complexity while maintaining delineation precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If historical yield data from multiple years is analyzed, then the reliability of management zone identification is improved, but data processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvezone identification reliabilityVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary aggregation and analysis of historical yield data from multiple years to establish stable zone boundaries and characteristics before current season operations. By pre-processing multi-year data to identify consistent spatial patterns and limiting factors, the system improves reliability of zone identification while reducing the need for time-consuming analysis during active decision-making periods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent maintains continuity by using established management zones and their identified limiting factors as a foundation for ongoing management decisions across multiple seasons. Once zones are delineated using historical data, the same zone framework can be reused and refined over time, avoiding repeated full-scale analysis while maintaining reliable zone identification

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentEP3944165B1Delineating management zones based on historical yield maps
Publication Date: 2025.09.17 MONSANTO TECHNOLOGY LLC
  • EP3944165B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3944165B1 patent drawingFigure 2(a)~2(b)
  • EP3944165B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

In an embodiment, a method comprises: receiving digital yield data representing yields of crops that have been harvested from an agricultural field; applying an empirical cumulative density function to the digital yield data to generate transformed digital yield data; smoothing the transformed digital yield data to result in generating and storing smooth transformed digital yield data; determining a first count value for a plurality of management classes; generating a plurality of first management zones for the agricultural field by clustering the smooth transformed digital yield data and using the first count value; generating a set of first merged management zones by merging one or more small management zones, of the plurality of first management zones, with their respective similar neighboring large zones; storing the set of first merged management zones and the first count value in a set of management zone metrics.