Yield Prediction System with Calibration Algorithms

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current yield monitoring systems face challenges in accurately calibrating yield data across multiple harvesting machines and spatially within a field, leading to inaccuracies and variability due to non-linearity and crop-dependent sensor behavior, which can result in visible striping and human error in calibration adjustments.

Innovation Solution

A system that utilizes multiple yield weight measurements and aerial imagery to dynamically construct predictive yield models, aligning yield monitor data with actual yield measurements, and applying corrections to enhance accuracy, allowing for real-time predictions of machine fill levels and optimizing harvesting operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multiple harvesting machines are used to increase productivity, then harvest efficiency is improved, but calibration mismatch and visible striping occur due to non-linear sensor behavior

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveharvest efficiencyVSAvoidyield data accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by transforming the non-linear yield monitor readings into linearized values through calibration equations. Each harvesting machine has its own calibration parameters that convert raw sensor outputs into accurate yield measurements, resolving the measurement precision issues caused by non-linear sensor behavior across multiple machines

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by using actual yield measurements from the harvesting machines to continuously refine and adjust calibration parameters. The calibrated yield data is fed back into the system to improve future measurements, eliminating calibration mismatch and visible striping artifacts in the yield maps

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If manual calibration adjustment is performed to correct yield map inaccuracies, then measurement precision is improved, but human error and variability increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveyield map accuracyVSAvoidcalibration consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service by automatically performing calibration adjustments without requiring manual intervention. The calibration equations and algorithms autonomously correct yield map inaccuracies, eliminating human error and variability while maintaining consistent measurement precision across different operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical adjustment process with an automated computational system. Instead of manually adjusting calibration parameters, the system uses computer algorithms to automatically calculate and apply corrections, substituting human operators with automated software that eliminates variability and error

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If simple average shifting is used to align yield data from multiple machines, then ease of operation is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates due to unaccounted variability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalibration simplicityVSAvoidyield variability alignment
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system transforms the simple average shifting approach into a more sophisticated parameter transformation method. Instead of merely shifting averages, the patent applies comprehensive calibration equations that transform raw yield data into aligned, variability-corrected measurements, maintaining ease of automated operation while dramatically improving measurement precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Measurement precision

If yield monitor calibration is performed to account for non-linearity, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor accuracyVSAvoidcalibration process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex manual calibration procedures with automated computational algorithms. The system uses computer-based calibration equations that automatically account for non-linearity, substituting complex manual processes with simpler automated software that maintains high measurement precision without increasing operational complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20240311734A1Harvest yield prediction methods and system
Publication Date: 2024.09.19 BITSTRATA SYST INC
  • US20240311734A1 patent drawing
  • US20240311734A1 patent drawing
  • US20240311734A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for yield prediction for a field using spatial data representing yield throughout the field and multiple measurements of actual yield obtained from field regions during harvesting of the field. A yield model is generated based on the spatial data and the multiple measurements of actual yield. The yield model is used to determine information related to yield in the field.