Zebrafish Early-Life Dinotefuran Toxicity Testing for Reliable Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for testing the toxicity of dinotefuran on fish are complex and fail to provide accurate data, lacking sensitivity and reliability.

Innovation Solution

A method using zebrafish embryos in a semi-static toxicity test with controlled conditions, including preparation of standard diluents and test drug liquids, exposure of embryos and larvae to varying concentrations of dinotefuran, and rigorous data analysis to determine observable and unobservable effect concentrations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If existing test methods are used for dinotefuran toxicity testing, then the testing can be performed, but the procedures are complicated and the test data accuracy is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetest data accuracyVSAvoidprocedure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The test method is segmented into distinct phases: embryo exposure (0-5 days) and larval exposure (5-30 days), with separate observation parameters for each stage. This segmentation allows for simplified procedures at each stage while maintaining comprehensive data collection for accurate toxicity assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The method changes key parameters including test organism (zebrafish), test stage (early life stages), exposure duration (30 days), and observation parameters (hatching rate, survival rate, malformation, behavioral abnormalities). These parameter changes simplify the test design while improving data accuracy and relevance to environmental risk assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If existing test methods are used for dinotefuran toxicity testing, then the testing can be performed, but the sensitivity and reliability are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetest reliabilityVSAvoidtesting sensitivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The method performs preliminary actions by acclimating zebrafish to test conditions before formal exposure begins, and by establishing control groups with identical handling procedures. This preliminary standardization ensures that observed effects are due to dinotefuran exposure rather than procedural variations, thereby improving both reliability and sensitivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The method incorporates continuous feedback through daily observation of hatching rates, survival rates, and developmental abnormalities, with water quality parameters monitored and adjusted throughout the 30-day test period. This feedback mechanism ensures test reliability by identifying and correcting deviations from expected patterns, while improving sensitivity to detect subtle toxic effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12399167B2Test method for toxicity of raw dinotefuran drug on early life stage of fish
Publication Date: 2025.08.26 ZHEJIANG ACADEMY OF AGRICULTURE SCIENCES

AI summary

The present invention provides a test method for toxicity of raw dinotefuran drug on early life stage of fish. The method includes: preparing a standard diluent, preparing test drug liquids, selecting a test organism, toxicant exposure of the embryos, toxicant exposure of larvae, monitoring and controlling test conditions, observation in the test, and statistically analyzing data and drawing results.