Zebrafish Behavioral Model Layout for Thigmotaxis-Free Stimulus Testing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current zebrafish autism behavioral models, particularly concentric circle models, fail to distinguish between external stimuli and innate thigmotaxis, and are limited in accommodating multiple zebrafish, leading to inconsistent experimental conditions and errors.

Innovation Solution

A laboratory zebrafish autism behavioral model apparatus with a cuboid structure divided into identical experimental units, featuring interconnected free swimming, stimulus, and normal non-stimulus areas, and mesh openings, allowing for increased zebrafish capacity and reduced interference from innate behaviors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If concentric circle models are used for zebrafish autism behavioral studies, then the experimental setup is simple, but the zebrafish's innate thigmotactic behavior interferes with the ability to determine swimming range due to external stimuli

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of experimental setupVSAvoidability to determine swimming range due to external stimuli
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The experimental apparatus is segmented into multiple independent experimental units (8 units per model body), each with distinct functional areas (free swimming area, stimulus area, normal non-stimulus area). This segmentation allows simultaneous experimentation with multiple zebrafish while maintaining controlled conditions in each unit, resolving the conflict between experimental simplicity and measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different areas within each experimental unit are designed with distinct properties: the free swimming area allows natural movement, the stimulus area provides controlled stimulation, and the normal non-stimulus area serves as control. This local differentiation enables precise measurement of zebrafish response to external stimuli while accounting for innate thigmotactic behavior.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Device complexity

If existing concentric circle models are used, then the experimental structure is simple, but only a limited number of zebrafish can be accommodated, leading to repeated trials and significant intra-group errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural complexity of modelVSAvoidnumber of zebrafish per batch and experimental efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The model body is divided into 8 identical experimental units, each capable of housing zebrafish independently. This segmentation increases productivity by allowing simultaneous experimentation with up to 8 zebrafish per model body, eliminating the need for repeated trials and reducing intra-group errors while maintaining manageable structural complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each experimental unit is designed with identical structure and functional areas, making them universally applicable for different experimental conditions. The standardized design allows any unit to serve any experimental purpose, increasing productivity without requiring complex specialized structures for each unit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Quantity of substance

If repeated trials are conducted with limited zebrafish capacity, then more data can be collected, but experimental conditions cannot be ensured to be consistent, resulting in significant intra-group errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetotal number of zebrafish testedVSAvoidconsistency of experimental conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the model into 8 identical experimental units, the system can accommodate multiple zebrafish simultaneously under consistent, controlled conditions. Each unit maintains identical structural parameters (dimensions, mesh opening sizes, area ratios), ensuring reliability while increasing the total quantity of zebrafish that can be tested in a single batch.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12527303B2Laboratory zebrafish autism behavioral model apparatus
Publication Date: 2026.01.20 SUZHOU UNIV
  • US12527303B2 patent drawing
  • US12527303B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A laboratory zebrafish autism behavioral model apparatus is provided. The laboratory zebrafish autism behavioral model apparatus comprises a model body, wherein the model body is divided into a plurality of experimental units, and each of the experimental units has a cuboid structure with completely identical shapes; a free swimming area, a stimulus area, and a normal non-stimulus area are formed on each of the experimental units; the stimulus area and the normal non-stimulus area are located on two sides of the free swimming area, respectively, and the free swimming area, the stimulus area, and the normal non-stimulus area are interconnected via mesh openings. The zebrafish autism behavioral model apparatus facilitates further exploration of autism etiology, effectively resolving interference between the stimulus area and the zebrafish's innate thigmotactic behavior, reducing experimental errors, saving time, and minimizing instrument wear and costs.