Zero-Cycle Load Instruction via Register Rename Unit

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Microprocessors face significant latency and throughput reduction due to RAW dependencies, particularly in load operations, which are not effectively addressed by existing techniques such as speculative execution and register renaming.

Innovation Solution

A processor system with a register rename unit that identifies zero-cycle load operations by predicting memory dependencies and using register renaming to forward data from a physical register file, allowing load instructions to complete without accessing memory, thereby reducing latency and increasing throughput.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If speculative execution and register renaming are used to handle RAW dependencies, then instruction parallelism is improved, but load latency remains significant and throughput is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstruction throughputVSAvoidload latency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by detecting potential RAW dependencies between store and load instructions before the load instruction executes. The system predicts memory dependencies and pre-converts qualifying load instructions to zero-cycle operations, allowing subsequent instructions to proceed without waiting for actual memory access. This advance preparation eliminates the latency penalty that would otherwise occur during load operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the execution time parameter of load instructions from multiple cycles to zero cycles for qualifying operations. By identifying loads that depend on store instructions and converting them to immediate operations with zero latency, the system fundamentally alters the time parameter for these specific memory operations, thereby improving overall instruction throughput without sacrificing correctness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If load instructions access memory to ensure data correctness, then reliability is improved, but instruction execution speed deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata correctnessVSAvoidinstruction execution speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms to verify the correctness of zero-cycle load operations. The system monitors whether the predicted memory dependency actually holds true and can flush or replay instructions if the prediction is incorrect. This feedback loop ensures data correctness is maintained while allowing most loads to execute at zero cycle latency, thus achieving both reliability and speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary validation of memory dependencies before converting loads to zero-cycle operations. By checking whether a store instruction truly precedes and depends on a load instruction in program order, the system ensures data correctness is preserved while enabling faster execution for validated cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If traditional register renaming is used to handle WAR and WAW dependencies, then instruction parallelism is improved, but architectural registers cause serialization due to repeated use as source and destination

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstruction parallelismVSAvoidregister management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the dependency resolution logic from traditional register renaming by specifically targeting RAW dependencies between memory operations. Instead of relying solely on complex register renaming to handle all dependencies, the system separately identifies and resolves memory-dependent RAW hazards, simplifying the overall register management while maintaining instruction parallelism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentEP2674856B1Zero cycle load instruction
Publication Date: 2019.08.21 APPLE INC
  • EP2674856B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2674856B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2674856B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A system and method for reducing the latency of load operations. A register rename unit within a processor determines whether a decoded load instruction is eligible for conversion to a zero-cycle load operation. If so, control logic assigns a physical register identifier associated with a source operand of an older dependent store instruction to the destination operand of the load instruction. Additionally, the register rename unit marks the load instruction to prevent it from reading data associated with the source operand of the store instruction from memory. Due to the duplicate renaming, this data may be forwarded from a physical register file to instructions that are younger and dependent on the load instruction.