Serial Receiver DC Gain Setting via Zeroth DFE Tap Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Variations in manufacturing processes result in significant variations in analog front end (AFE) gain from chip to chip, leading to potential saturation of circuits and bit errors in serial links, necessitating a method to set the AFE gain effectively.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for setting the gain of an analog front end in a serial receiver, involving a first analog front end with adjustable DC gain, a data slicer, an error slicer, and a processor unit that iteratively adjusts the DC gain and estimates the zeroth channel tap value using the equation h0(n+1)=h0(n)+mu*Error*Data, ensuring the gain is within a set range to avoid saturation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manufacturing processes are used to produce AFE circuits, then production volume is increased, but gain variation between chips increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction volumeVSAvoidgain variation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the gain parameter of the AFE circuit dynamically through iterative adjustment. The processor unit adjusts the gain value based on feedback from the zeroth channel tap value measurements, transforming a fixed manufacturing parameter into a可调 parameter that can be optimized for each chip individually.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-calibration by automatically measuring its own zeroth channel tap value and adjusting its gain accordingly. The AFE circuit and processor work together to self-correct the gain variation without requiring external manual calibration, enabling mass production while maintaining performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If AFE gain is increased to improve signal quality, then signal-to-noise ratio is improved, but circuit saturation occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal qualityVSAvoidcircuit saturation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the zeroth channel tap value is measured and used to control the gain adjustment. The processor continuously monitors the tap value and adjusts the gain accordingly, creating a closed-loop control system that prevents saturation while maximizing signal quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The gain is made dynamic rather than static, allowing it to be adjusted iteratively based on the measured zeroth channel tap value. This dynamic adjustment enables the system to find the optimal gain value that maximizes signal quality without causing saturation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Stability of the object's composition

If AFE gain is decreased to avoid saturation, then circuit stability is improved, but bit errors increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecircuit stabilityVSAvoidbit error rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The feedback mechanism uses the zeroth channel tap value as an indicator to determine whether the gain is too low. When the tap value indicates insufficient signal level, the processor increases the gain, thereby reducing bit errors while maintaining stability through controlled adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The iterative dynamic adjustment process allows the gain to be optimized for each operating condition. By continuously adapting the gain based on measured performance, the system achieves both stability and low bit error rate simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Manufacturing precision

If iterative gain adjustment is implemented to correct manufacturing variations, then gain precision is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegain precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The processor unit performs multiple functions: it controls the gain adjustment, measures the zeroth channel tap value, and determines when calibration is complete. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate dedicated calibration circuits, thereby limiting the increase in system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-calibration using its own existing resources (processor, AFE circuit, and measurement capabilities), eliminating the need for external calibration equipment or complex manual procedures. This self-service approach achieves high precision while keeping the system relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS10256784B2System and method for setting analog front end DC gain
Publication Date: 2019.04.09 SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO LTD
  • US10256784B2 patent drawing
  • US10256784B2 patent drawing
  • US10256784B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for setting analog front end in a serial receiver. The serial receiver includes a decision feedback equalizer. During initialization, taps of the decision feedback equalizer other than the zeroth tap are disabled, and the zeroth tap is used to estimate the amplitude of the signal at the output of the analog front end. The analog front end gain is iteratively adjusted until the estimated value of the zeroth tap is within a set range.