Zinc Oxide Sorbent Process for Sulfur Removal

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing zinc oxide-based sorbents for removing sulfur-containing gases generate ammonia-containing wastes during manufacturing, necessitating the development of alternative processes that minimize environmental impact while maintaining sorbent effectiveness.

Innovation Solution

The use of alkali metal hydroxides or alkali metal carbonates in the co-precipitation process to produce zinc oxide-based sorbents with a two-phase structure, reducing ammonia production and enhancing sorbent reactivity and stability, with residual sodium levels controlled to optimize performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If ammonium hydroxide is used in the co-precipitation process, then zinc oxide-based sorbents can be produced with uniform phase distribution and small crystallite size, but ammonia-containing wastes are generated causing environmental pollution

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuniform phase distributionVSAvoidammonia-containing wastes
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical parameter of the precipitating agent from ammonium hydroxide to alkali metal hydroxides or carbonates. This substitution maintains the coprecipitation mechanism that produces uniform ZnO and ZnAl2O4 phase distribution while eliminating ammonia waste generation, thus resolving the contradiction between manufacturing precision and environmental harm.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the potentially harmful ammonia byproduct into a beneficial outcome by using alternative alkali metal-based precipitants. The alkali metals (Na, K, Rb, Cs) serve as beneficial residual components that enhance sorbent performance while their compounds are more environmentally acceptable than ammonia waste, transforming a harmful process into a beneficial one.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

2Object-generated harmful factors

If alkali metal hydroxides or carbonates are used instead of ammonium hydroxide, then environmental impact is reduced, but process conditions must be optimized to control residual sodium levels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenvironmental impactVSAvoidprocess optimization requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces new process parameters (pH control range of 5.0-10.0, temperature control at 25-75°C, washing steps) to optimize the coprecipitation process using alkali metal hydroxides or carbonates. These parameter adjustments enable control of residual sodium levels while maintaining uniform phase distribution, balancing environmental benefits with process complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates preliminary washing steps and pH adjustment procedures before the coprecipitation reaction to pre-control the residual alkali metal content. By performing these preparatory actions, the process simplifies subsequent steps and ensures optimal residual sodium levels in the final sorbent product.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Object-generated harmful factors

If residual sodium content is minimized to reduce environmental impact, then environmental compliance is improved, but sorbent reactivity and stability may be affected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresidual sodium contentVSAvoidsorbent reactivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent identifies and controls critical parameters (pH 5.0-10.0, temperature 25-75°C, precipitation rate, washing intensity) that simultaneously influence both residual sodium content and sorbent performance. By optimizing these parameters within specific ranges, the process achieves low residual sodium (25-2500 ppm) while maintaining high sorbent reactivity and stability for sulfur removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where residual alkali metal content is monitored and the washing/precipitation conditions are adjusted accordingly. This closed-loop control ensures that residual sodium is kept at optimal levels that satisfy environmental requirements while preserving the catalytic activity needed for sorbent function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Manufacturing precision

If coprecipitation process is used to achieve uniform phase distribution, then manufacturing precision is improved, but process complexity and waste treatment requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuniform phase distributionVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent simplifies the coprecipitation process by changing the chemical parameters (using alkali metal hydroxides or carbonates instead of ammonium hydroxide) and optimizing physical parameters (pH 5.0-10.0, temperature 25-75°C). These parameter changes maintain the uniform phase distribution advantage while reducing chemical complexity and waste treatment burden compared to traditional ammonium-based processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The resulting sorbents effectively remove H2S and COS from gas streams across a wide temperature range, maintaining high reactivity and attrition resistance through multiple absorption-regeneration cycles, with reduced sodium content minimizing environmental impact.

Implementation Method 1

The use of alkali metal hydroxides or alkali metal carbonates in the co-precipitation process to produce zinc oxide-based sorbents with a two-phase structure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPrecipitation: Precipitation

Implementation Method 2

The resulting sorbents effectively remove H2S and COS from gas streams

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbsorption: Absorption (physical)

Implementation Method 3

zinc oxide-based sorbents that can react with reduced sulfur components and remove them from a gas stream

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical reaction: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 4

maintaining high reactivity and attrition resistance through multiple absorption-regeneration cycles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Data Source

PatentUS11491457B2Zinc oxide based sorbent and process for preparing same
Publication Date: 2022.11.08 RES TRIANGLE INST
  • US11491457B2 patent drawing
  • US11491457B2 patent drawing
  • US11491457B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Zinc oxide-based sorbents, and processes for preparing and using them are provided, wherein the sorbents are preferably used to remove one or more reduced sulfur species from gas streams. The sorbents contain an active zinc component, optionally in combination with one or more promoter components and/or one or more substantially inert components. The active zinc component is a two-phase material, consisting essentially of a zinc oxide (ZnO) phase and a zinc aluminate (ZnAl2O4) phase. Each of the two phases is characterized by a relatively small crystallite size of typically less than about 50 nm (500 Angstroms). Preferably the sorbents are prepared by using an alkali metal base to convert a precursor mixture, containing a precipitated zinc oxide precursor and a precipitated aluminum oxide precursor, to the two-phase, active zinc oxide containing component, with the resulting sorbent having a sodium level within a desired range.