Zintl-Salt Silicon-Carbon Anodes for Lower Resistance and Longer Cycling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional battery anodes are costly, cumbersome, and inefficient, limiting battery lifetime due to complex implementation and inefficiencies in energy storage and conductivity.

Innovation Solution

A metal halide silicon-carbon composite material is developed using nanoparticulate silicon, microparticulate silicon, and metal salts, which is incorporated into electrodes to enhance conductivity and cyclability, improving the performance and lifespan of lithium-ion batteries.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional battery anodes are used, then manufacturing cost and complexity are reduced, but battery lifetime and performance are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery lifetimeVSAvoidanode structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses composite materials by combining silicon nanoparticles, silicon microparticles, and metal halide salts to create a multi-component anode structure. This composite approach improves battery lifetime and galvanic cycling performance while managing the complexity through a systematic material composition rather than a single complex component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes key parameters of the anode material including particle size distribution (nanoparticulate and microparticulate silicon), metal halide salt concentration (0.1-10 wt%), and material composition ratios. These parameter optimizations improve battery performance and lifetime while providing a scalable manufacturing approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If conventional anode materials are used, then implementation is simpler, but energy storage efficiency and conductivity are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy storage efficiencyVSAvoidanode manufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes parameters including metal halide salt concentration (0.1-10 wt%), silicon particle size distribution, and heating temperature ranges (50-200°C for mixing, up to 1000°C for pyrolysis). These parameter changes improve energy storage efficiency while maintaining manufacturability through controlled processing conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a two-stage process where organic binder is first used to facilitate mixing and coating, then removed through pyrolysis to leave a conductive carbon matrix. This approach simplifies manufacturing by using temporary binding agents that are subsequently eliminated, improving energy storage efficiency without permanent manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

3Reliability

If nanoparticulate silicon is used to improve conductivity, then high-frequency resistance increases, but cyclability performance improves

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegalvanic cycling performanceVSAvoidhigh-frequency resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a composite structure combining nanoparticulate silicon (for high capacity and cyclability) with metal halide salts and carbon matrix (for conductivity). This composite approach balances the harmful high-frequency resistance against the beneficial galvanic cycling performance improvement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The metal halide salts and carbon matrix act as intermediary materials that mediate between the nanoparticulate silicon and the electrolyte/external circuit. These intermediaries improve electrical conductivity and reduce high-frequency resistance while allowing the nanoparticulate silicon to maintain its superior cyclability performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If metal halide salts are added to improve conductivity, then material cost increases, but battery performance and lifespan improve

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery lifespanVSAvoidmaterial composition complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the metal halide salt concentration parameter within a specific range (0.1-10 wt%) to achieve the desired balance between improved battery lifespan and material cost. This parameter optimization ensures that sufficient performance improvement is obtained without excessive material complexity or cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The metal halide salts serve multiple functions simultaneously: they improve electrical conductivity, enhance galvanic cycling performance, and contribute to the overall structural stability of the anode. This multi-functionality justifies the added material complexity by delivering multiple performance benefits from a single additive component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The composite material reduces high-frequency resistance and improves galvanic cycling performance, leading to increased energy density and extended battery life, making lithium-ion batteries more efficient and cost-effective.

Implementation Method 1

conductive materials that include a combination of silicon nanoparticles, silicon microparticles, and metal salts

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConduction (electrical): Conduction (electrical)

Implementation Method 2

improves galvanic cycling performance, leading to increased energy density and extended battery life

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGalvanic cycling: Redox Reactions

Data Source

PatentUS11804596B2Silicon composites using zintl salts for silicon anode batteries
Publication Date: 2023.10.31 ENEVATE CORP
  • US11804596B2 patent drawing
  • US11804596B2 patent drawing
  • US11804596B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are disclosed that provide for a silicon-carbon composite material that includes nanoparticulate (e.g., nanocrystalline) silicon derived from a reaction between a zintl salt and metal halide. The nanoparticulate silicon-carbon composite material can be used to provide electrode materials (e.g., anode) and cells.