Decentralized Identity Management Using Zero-Knowledge Proofs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Decentralized ledgers face challenges in maintaining user privacy and identity management due to the lack of compatible security and privacy protection mechanisms, as users cannot safely disclose identity information without risking exposure in a decentralized environment.

Innovation Solution

A decentralized ledger-based identity management system that includes an identity creation authority, identity owner, and identity claim verifier, utilizing public/private key pairs and zero-knowledge proof technology to verify identity claims without revealing concrete identity information, ensuring privacy and supporting complex identity structures and high-performance operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If identity information is stored in plain text for easy verification, then verification efficiency is improved, but user privacy is compromised as all participants can learn the information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverification efficiencyVSAvoidprivacy exposure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces cryptographic intermediaries (hash functions, zero-knowledge proofs, and encrypted data structures) that mediate between identity information and verification processes. These intermediaries allow verification to occur without direct exposure of raw identity data, thus maintaining both efficiency and privacy. Specifically, identity claims are transformed into cryptographic proofs that can be verified without revealing the underlying identity information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms identity information from its original form into different cryptographic representations (hashes, encrypted claims, zero-knowledge proofs) that preserve verification capabilities while eliminating privacy risks. The same identity data is represented in multiple parameter forms depending on the operational context - stored as hashes on-chain, encrypted in storage, and transformed into zero-knowledge proofs for verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If ordinary encryption is used to protect identity information, then privacy is improved, but participants cannot process the information for verification

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprivacy protectionVSAvoidprocessing capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments identity information into multiple cryptographic components that can be independently processed. Identity claims are divided into verifiable credentials, proofs, and metadata that can be handled separately. This segmentation allows different parts of the system to process different aspects of identity data without requiring access to the complete encrypted identity set, thus maintaining both privacy and processing capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical encryption/decryption systems with cryptographic proof systems. Instead of decrypting identity information to process it, the system uses zero-knowledge proofs and cryptographic signatures that allow verification without decryption. This substitution eliminates the need to break encryption for processing while maintaining full verification functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If a centralized authority manages identity verification, then verification reliability is improved, but the decentralized nature of the ledger is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverification reliabilityVSAvoiddecentralization compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates universal cryptographic verification mechanisms that can be implemented by any participant in the decentralized ledger without requiring a centralized authority. The identity claim verification process is designed to be universally applicable - any node can verify identity claims using the same cryptographic rules, making the system both decentralized and reliably verifiable. The verification logic is embedded in the protocol itself rather than in a central authority.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables identity verification to be self-service, where identity holders can prove their own identity credentials without requiring centralized verification. Zero-knowledge proofs allow users to self-verify and present proof of identity attributes to the ledger without external intervention. This self-service capability maintains decentralization while ensuring verification reliability through cryptographic guarantees.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11275865B2Privacy friendly decentralized ledger based identity management system and methods
Publication Date: 2022.03.15 CONDUENT BUSINESS SERVICES LLC
  • US11275865B2 patent drawing
  • US11275865B2 patent drawing
  • US11275865B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods providing user privacy in association with decentralized ledger technology are disclosed. Improved methods and systems for access control are disclosed wherein an access request can be received at the distributed ledger to fetch a data file without disclosing requester identity, that can verify the access request at the decentralized ledger as a legitimate request or as a malicious/faulty request, and can assist a user of a legitimate request to access the data and deny access to malicious/faulty requests that are compatible with a decentralized ledger environment.