Zonal Power Grid Control for Low-Latency Autonomous Operation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The increased complexity of modern power grids due to variable energy sources and controllable loads poses challenges in centralized control, requiring efficient management and monitoring of numerous node points and circuit configurations.

Innovation Solution

Implementing zonal autonomous control systems that divide power grids into transmission and distribution zones, utilizing zonal controllers and federated grid models for decentralized management and automation, integrating intelligent electronic devices for real-time data utilization and predictive control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If centralized control is used to manage power grids, then control coordination is maintained, but control efficiency decreases and latency increases due to the large number of node points to monitor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol efficiencyVSAvoidnumber of node points to monitor
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The power grid is divided into multiple zones with zone boundaries, where each zone is managed by a separate zone controller. This segmentation reduces the number of node points that each controller must monitor directly, while maintaining overall grid coordination through inter-zone communication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If centralized control monitors all node points, then comprehensive grid awareness is achieved, but data processing load and communication requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrid monitoring comprehensivenessVSAvoiddata processing load
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

Data processing is distributed across multiple zone controllers, each handling data for their respective zones. This reduces the data processing load on any single controller while maintaining comprehensive grid monitoring through aggregated zone-level data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each zone controller performs local data processing and decision-making for its zone, reducing communication requirements with the central system. Only essential zone-level data and control commands are exchanged, rather than all individual node data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Loss of time

If zonal autonomous control is implemented, then control efficiency and response time improve, but system complexity increases due to multiple controllers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol latencyVSAvoidnumber of controllers
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into autonomous zone controllers that operate independently within their zones, eliminating the need for centralized decision-making for local control actions. This reduces control latency while the standardized zone controller architecture manages the complexity of having multiple controllers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250392161A1Power grid systems and methods with zonal autonomous control
Publication Date: 2025.12.25 GE VERNOVA INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGY LLC
  • US20250392161A1 patent drawing
  • US20250392161A1 patent drawing
  • US20250392161A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of operating a power grid comprising a plurality of transmission zones is provided herein. In some embodiments, the method includes receiving zonal operational data and receiving zonal forecast data from a plurality of zonal controllers associated with the plurality of transmission zones. The method also includes determining a zonal adaptive policy for a transmission zone of the plurality of transmission zones based on the zonal operational data and the zonal forecast data. The zonal adaptive policy defines a rule for a zonal controller associated with the transmission zone in a normal mode of operation. The method further includes communicating the zonal adaptive policy to at least one of the plurality of zonal controllers and communicating an intervention command to the zonal controller associated with the transmission zone. The intervention command intervenes with the normal mode of operation and adjusts an operational parameter of the transmission zone.