Zone-Based Temperature Control Using Occupant Preference Inputs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional temperature control systems in buildings often rely on a single fixed temperature setting, which can be uncomfortable and inefficient, as they do not account for the varying preferences and schedules of numerous employees, leading to decreased productivity and increased energy consumption.

Innovation Solution

An interactive environmental control system that allows individual employees to input their temperature preferences through a computing device, using artificial intelligence and machine learning to customize temperature settings for each zone within a building, optimizing comfort and energy efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a single fixed temperature setting is used throughout the building, then the temperature control system is simple to operate, but employee comfort and productivity decrease due to not accounting for varying preferences

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature control system operationVSAvoidemployee productivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The building is divided into multiple zones, each with independent temperature control capabilities. This segmentation allows different temperature settings in different areas to accommodate varying employee preferences while maintaining overall system simplicity through automated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically adjusts temperatures based on sensor data and pre-programmed preferences without requiring manual intervention from employees. This self-service approach maintains ease of operation while improving comfort and productivity through personalized environmental conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Device complexity

If a single fixed temperature setting is used throughout the building, then the system requires minimal control mechanisms, but energy consumption increases due to inability to optimize for actual occupancy and preferences

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The temperature control system dynamically adjusts settings based on real-time occupancy detection and environmental sensor data. This dynamic approach allows the system to optimize energy consumption by modifying temperatures according to actual conditions rather than maintaining fixed settings, reducing energy waste in unoccupied areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates sensors that continuously monitor occupancy, temperature, and other environmental parameters, feeding this information back to the control mechanism. This feedback loop enables automated optimization of energy consumption while maintaining comfort, without requiring complex manual control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If individualized temperature preferences are implemented for each employee, then employee comfort and productivity improve, but the system complexity and implementation cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemployee productivityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The building is divided into multiple zones, each with independent temperature control capabilities. This segmentation allows different temperature settings in different areas to accommodate varying employee preferences while maintaining overall system simplicity through automated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically adjusts temperatures based on sensor data and pre-programmed preferences without requiring manual intervention from employees. This self-service approach maintains ease of operation while improving comfort and productivity through personalized environmental conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Ease of repair

If traditional fixed temperature control is used, then the system is easy to maintain, but employee satisfaction and comfort decrease leading to higher operational costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem maintenanceVSAvoidemployee discomfort
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of repairVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically adjusts temperatures based on sensor data and pre-programmed preferences without requiring manual intervention from employees. This self-service approach maintains ease of operation while improving comfort and productivity through personalized environmental conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates sensors that continuously monitor occupancy, temperature, and other environmental parameters, feeding this information back to the control mechanism. This feedback loop enables automated optimization of energy consumption while maintaining comfort, without requiring complex manual control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11982457B2Interactive temperature control system
Publication Date: 2024.05.14 MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US11982457B2 patent drawing
  • US11982457B2 patent drawing
  • US11982457B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and devices for an interactive environmental control system are described. In some examples, operating temperatures for individual zones of an environment may be determined based on inputs received from occupants of the respective zones. For example, a building may be separated into zones, and environmental conditions at each zone may be monitored and adjusted independently. Each occupant of a zone may update their environmental preference and the system may utilize the user inputs to set and adjust an operating temperature for the respective zone based on the occupants' preferences. In some examples, the system may implement machine learning techniques to predict and set operating conditions for the zones based on inputs, such as a history of inputs, from building occupants (e.g., from occupants of a respective zone).