Geo-demographic Zoning Optimization Engine for Precinct Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current precinct design processes, even with GIS software, are inefficient, prone to human error, and do not fully leverage information technology, leading to sub-optimal resource allocation and potential societal inequities due to human bias and gerrymandering.

Innovation Solution

A geo-demographic zoning optimization engine that automates the precinct design process using a web-based interface, employing a multi-objective optimization algorithm to minimize precinct splits, ensure voter compactness, and adhere to user-defined constraints, thereby reducing human error and optimizing precinct boundaries.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual or traditional GIS-based precinct design is used, then human control and flexibility are maintained, but the process is inefficient, error-prone, and subject to human bias

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecinct design efficiencyVSAvoidprecision of precinct boundaries
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical GIS operations with an automated computational optimization engine that uses mathematical algorithms to generate precinct boundaries. This substitution eliminates human error and bias while maintaining the ability to incorporate legal and demographic constraints through algorithmic optimization rather than manual adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The optimization engine performs self-service by automatically generating optimal precinct configurations without requiring manual intervention. The system takes demographic data, legal constraints, and geographic information as inputs and autonomously computes precinct boundaries that satisfy all constraints while optimizing for compactness and population equality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of manufacture

If traditional GIS software is used for precinct design, then existing tools and expertise can be leveraged, but the process remains trial-and-error and resource-intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of implementing precinct designVSAvoidtime required for precinct design
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-computing optimal precinct configurations using optimization algorithms before final implementation. The engine evaluates multiple possible boundary configurations and selects the optimal solution that satisfies all constraints, eliminating the need for iterative trial-and-error adjustments that characterize traditional GIS-based design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If human experts design precincts, then institutional knowledge and local nuances can be incorporated, but human bias and gerrymandering risks increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to incorporate local constraintsVSAvoidhuman bias and gerrymandering
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The optimization engine serves as an intermediary between demographic data, legal constraints, and final precinct boundaries. Rather than humans directly drawing boundaries, the system mediates by computationally optimizing configurations that satisfy all constraints including legal requirements and demographic considerations, thereby eliminating direct human bias while maintaining adaptability to local conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Ease of operation

If manual precinct design is used, then flexibility in adjustment is maintained, but the quality and representativeness of precincts deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in precinct adjustmentVSAvoidquality of precinct boundaries
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic optimization by using algorithms that can adaptively adjust precinct boundaries based on multiple competing objectives such as population equality, compactness, and constraint satisfaction. The optimization engine dynamically evaluates different boundary configurations and transitions to the optimal solution, providing both precision and flexibility simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11763404B2Systems, methods, and apparatuses for implementing a geo-demographic zoning optimization engine
Publication Date: 2023.09.19 THE ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS ON BEHALF OF THE UNIV OF ARIZONA
  • US11763404B2 patent drawing
  • US11763404B2 patent drawing
  • US11763404B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods, and apparatuses for implementing a geo-demographic zoning optimization engine are disclosed. According to an exemplary embodiment, there is a system executing at a web platform, in which the system includes: a memory to store instructions; a set of one or more processors; a non-transitory machine-readable storage medium that provides instructions that, when executed by the set of one or more processors, the instructions stored in the memory are configurable to cause the system to perform operations for designing sectioned mappings for a geo-demographic region, the operations including: executing instructions via the processor to implement a receive interface at the web platform; exposing the receive interface to users of the web platform; receiving, at the receive interface, geographic information system (GIS) data defining a plurality of district boundary spatial layers for a plurality of land parcels representing districts located at least partially within the geo-demographic region; creating a plurality of zones by overlapping the plurality of district boundary spatial layers; combining separate subsets of the plurality of zones into temporary exclusive regions; optimizing a number of precincts for each of the temporary exclusive regions by combining two or more of the temporary exclusive regions into a number of precincts; in which the optimizing comprises executing an algorithm based on hierarchical objectives configured to minimize splitting precincts that contain more than one district of any type, subject to user-selected input parameters operating as constraints; and generating a design plan map with optimized number, shape, size, and boundaries defining every precinct of the design plan map outputted from the web platform to a user interface. Other related embodiments are disclosed.