Zoom-adaptive Geospatial Data Granularity for Mapping Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current geospatial mapping systems face challenges in presenting detailed geographic landmarks at higher presentation levels, leading to overwhelming data and increased latency, while users desire advanced features without zooming in.

Innovation Solution

The geospatial mapping system allows users to promote geospatial artifact data into a geospatial layer data set, enabling additional features by including more detailed data for specific artifacts or subsets at higher presentation levels, reducing latency through selective data inclusion based on user request.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If detailed geospatial artifact data is presented at higher presentation levels, then information completeness is improved, but data transmission time and processing latency increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation completenessVSAvoiddata transmission time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different data granularity levels to different regions of the map based on user interaction. When a user hovers over or selects a specific geographic landmark, the system provides detailed artifact data for that specific location while maintaining aggregated or simplified data for other regions. This local quality approach ensures information completeness is improved only where needed, without increasing overall data transmission time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the level of data detail provided to users based on their interaction state. At higher presentation levels (zoomed out), the system initially provides aggregated data, but upon user interaction (hover, click, selection), it dynamically transitions to providing detailed artifact data for the selected region or landmark. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction by providing complete information on-demand rather than transmitting all data upfront.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Loss of information

If all geospatial artifacts are presented at higher presentation levels, then data completeness is improved, but system complexity and processing overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata completenessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements local quality by providing detailed geospatial artifact data only for specific regions or landmarks that users interact with, rather than presenting all artifacts with equal detail across the entire map. This approach maintains data completeness for user-focused areas while avoiding the system complexity of managing and rendering all detailed data simultaneously across the full map view.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial action by providing complete artifact data only for the subset of geographic landmarks that are currently selected or hovered over by the user, rather than providing complete data for all landmarks. This partial data provision approach achieves data completeness where needed without incurring the full system complexity of processing and managing all possible artifact data at all times.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Loss of information

If zoomed in to view detailed landmarks, then information granularity is improved, but user convenience and interaction efficiency decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation granularityVSAvoiduser convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts information granularity based on user interaction rather than requiring physical zooming. When users hover over or select landmarks at higher presentation levels, the system dynamically provides detailed information for those specific landmarks, effectively delivering zoomed-in information granularity without requiring users to zoom in, thus maintaining ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the map into multiple regions or landmarks and provides detailed information for individually selected segments rather than requiring the entire map to be zoomed in. This segmentation approach allows users to access detailed information for specific landmarks of interest while maintaining the broader contextual view, improving both information granularity and user convenience simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS9865034B1Zoom-adaptive data granularity to achieve a flexible high-performance interface for a geospatial mapping system
Publication Date: 2018.01.09 PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US9865034B1 patent drawing
  • US9865034B1 patent drawing
  • US9865034B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A geospatial mapping system can access a geospatial layer data set for a first geographic area defined by a first presentation level, and provide the geospatial layer data set for the first geographic area to a client device to present a visual rendering of the first geographic area. The geospatial mapping system can receive a request to utilize an advanced feature set on a subset of geospatial artifacts located within the first geographic area, and promote, to the geospatial layer data set, an additional geospatial artifact data set for the subset of geospatial artifacts, yielding an updated geospatial layer data set for the first geographic area. The geospatial mapping system can provide the updated geospatial layer data set to the client device to provide the advanced feature set for interacting with the subset of geospatial artifacts located within the first geographic area.