Zygomatic EEG Detection of Medial Temporal Lobe Epileptic Events

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Detecting pathological electrophysiological events such as Interictal Epileptiform Discharges (IEDs) in the medial temporal lobe (MTL) regions is challenging with scalp EEG, as these events often occur spontaneously and are difficult to capture non-invasively.

Innovation Solution

A machine learning (ML) based platform using zygomatic EEG data to detect MTL epileptic activity by training ML models with intracranial depth electrode data, followed by non-invasive facial EEG channels, enabling reliable detection of IEDs and other events with high precision.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If scalp EEG is used to detect EP events, then non-invasive detection is achieved, but detection reliability deteriorates for MTL regions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenon-invasive detectionVSAvoiddetection reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses zygomatic bone EEG electrodes as an intermediary structure that bridges the gap between non-invasive scalp EEG and invasive MTL detection. The zygomatic bone serves as a physical mediator that transmits electrical signals from deep MTL structures to surface electrodes, enabling non-invasive detection with improved reliability compared to conventional scalp EEG.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by specifically targeting the zygomatic bone region for electrode placement, rather than using general scalp EEG positions. This localized approach concentrates the detection capability on the specific anatomical pathway that provides optimal access to MTL structures, improving detection reliability for this critical region while maintaining non-invasive operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Device complexity

If conventional scalp EEG is used, then simple electrode placement is maintained, but detection precision deteriorates for deep brain structures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrode placement simplicityVSAvoiddetection precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention maintains relative simplicity by using surface electrodes but achieves improved precision through local quality enhancement - specifically placing electrodes on the zygomatic bone, which has unique anatomical properties that provide better signal transmission from MTL structures compared to conventional scalp positions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a functional copy of the invasive depth electrode detection capability using non-invasive zygomatic EEG. By training ML models on paired datasets (intracranial and zygomatic EEG), the system replicates the detection precision of invasive methods through a non-invasive proxy measurement approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Measurement precision

If ML models are trained on intracranial data, then detection precision improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-training ML models using intracranial EEG data before deploying them for non-invasive detection. This offline training phase prepares the models in advance with ground-truth labeled data, so that during actual operation, the system can achieve high detection precision without requiring real-time complex processing or additional invasive procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a computational copy of the intracranial detection capability by training ML models to learn the mapping between zygomatic EEG signals and MTL EP events. This computational model serves as a virtual replica of the invasive detection system, achieving similar precision without the physical complexity of intracranial electrode implantation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS20250359813A1System and method of detecting electrophysiological events in a subject
Publication Date: 2025.11.27 ICHILOV TECH LTD
  • US20250359813A1 patent drawing
  • US20250359813A1 patent drawing
  • US20250359813A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method of detecting Electrophysiological events such as Interictal Epileptiform Discharge (IED) events, or other pathological and physiological electrophysiological events, in a human subject by at least one processor may include, for example: placing at least one first electroencephalogram (EEG) electrode over a zygomatic bone or a maxilla of the subject, directly below the subject's orbit in the subject's inferior direction; receiving a first EEG signal from the at least one first EEG electrode; processing the first EEG signal, to obtain one or more first EEG data elements; and inferring at least one machine-learning (ML) based model on the one or more first EEG data elements, to predict occurrence of at least one IED event in the subject.