ZZYX Processor Architecture Scalable Execution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current data processing architectures face inefficiencies in energy consumption and adaptability across different processing powers, with reconfigurable processors being inefficient for sequential operations and requiring significant resources and time for reconfiguration, while traditional processors struggle with scalability and flexibility.

Innovation Solution

The ZZYX processor architecture features multiple ALU-Blocks in an array with pipeline stages, allowing for scalable processing by optimizing loop execution and enabling implicit software scalability, with instructions remaining valid for multiple clock cycles and data streamed through ALUs, supporting various execution modes and reducing the need for frequent reconfiguration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If reconfigurable processors are used to improve adaptability, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity and reconfiguration time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadaptabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The processor architecture dynamically switches between sequential execution mode and parallel execution mode based on the characteristics of the workload. The control unit determines whether to execute instructions sequentially or to issue instructions to multiple ALU-Blocks in parallel, providing adaptability without requiring physical reconfiguration of the hardware architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The same processor core can operate in multiple execution modes (sequential and parallel) using the same hardware resources. The ALU-Blocks can be used individually for sequential operations or collectively for parallel operations, making the processor universal and eliminating the need for separate reconfigurable hardware for different workloads.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If reconfigurable processors are used to improve adaptability, then adaptability is improved, but processing time for reconfiguration increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadaptabilityVSAvoidreconfiguration time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The processor uses dynamic mode switching rather than physical reconfiguration. The control unit can transition between sequential and parallel execution modes instantaneously based on instruction characteristics, eliminating the time-consuming reconfiguration process while maintaining adaptability to different computational workloads.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Speed

If traditional processors are used to improve sequential processing efficiency, then processing speed is improved, but scalability is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidscalability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The processor architecture nests multiple levels of parallelism within a single core. ALU-Blocks are arranged in an array where multiple blocks can execute instructions simultaneously, and each ALU-Block can further process multiple data elements. This nested structure enables scalability from sequential to parallel processing without requiring multiple separate processor cores.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The processing unit is segmented into multiple independent ALU-Blocks that can operate autonomously in parallel. Each ALU-Block is a functional unit that can execute instructions independently, allowing the processor to scale processing capacity by utilizing more segments simultaneously while maintaining the efficiency of individual processing units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Productivity

If multiple ALU-Blocks are used to improve parallel processing capability, then productivity is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparallel processing capabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The processor activates only the necessary number of ALU-Blocks based on the current workload requirements. For sequential operations, only one ALU-Block is active, consuming minimal energy. For parallel operations, multiple ALU-Blocks are activated simultaneously. This partial activation approach ensures that energy consumption is proportional to the actual processing needs, avoiding the excessive energy consumption that would occur if all ALU-Blocks were always active.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10908914B2Issuing instructions to multiple execution units
Publication Date: 2021.02.02 UBITIUM GMBH
  • US10908914B2 patent drawing
  • US10908914B2 patent drawing
  • US10908914B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A single chip sequential processor comprising at least one ALU-Block, where said sequential processor is capable of maintaining its op-codes while processing data such as to overcome the necessity of requiring a new instruction in every clock cycle.