Eureka delivers breakthrough ideas for toughest innovation challenges, trusted by R&D personnel around the world.

Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage (CCS): Is It Viable Long Term?

JUL 21, 2025 |

Understanding Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage (CCS)

Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage (CCS) has emerged as a crucial technology in the global fight against climate change. It involves capturing carbon dioxide emissions from sources like power plants and industrial processes, transporting it to a storage site, and depositing it underground, usually in geological formations, to prevent it from entering the atmosphere. The primary goal of CCS is to mitigate the impact of carbon emissions, a significant contributor to global warming, while allowing industries to continue operations without drastically altering their production processes.

The Growing Need for CCS

With the global demand for energy continuing to rise, predominantly powered by fossil fuels, CCS offers a transitional solution. The energy sector is a major source of carbon emissions, and without significant interventions, these emissions will only increase. CCS can potentially reduce emissions from power plants by up to 90%, making it an attractive option for countries striving to meet their climate goals under international agreements like the Paris Accord.

Current CCS Technologies

There are three main types of carbon capture technologies: pre-combustion, post-combustion, and oxy-fuel combustion. Each has its own set of advantages and challenges.

1. Pre-combustion capture involves transforming fossil fuels into a mixture of hydrogen and CO2 before combustion. It’s more efficient and effective but requires significant changes to existing energy infrastructure.

2. Post-combustion capture takes place after fossil fuels have been burned, using chemical solvents to separate CO2 from other gases. This method can be retrofitted to existing power plants, making it a popular choice, despite its higher cost and energy requirements.

3. Oxy-fuel combustion burns fossil fuels in pure oxygen instead of air, producing a more concentrated stream of CO2 that is easier to capture. However, the need for pure oxygen makes this technology more expensive.

The Economic Viability of CCS

One of the primary concerns about the long-term viability of CCS is its economic cost. Capturing and storing carbon is expensive, and the infrastructure required for transportation and storage adds to the financial burden. While the cost of CCS is expected to decrease as technology advances and economies of scale are realized, the current high costs deter widespread adoption. Governments and industries need to invest significantly in research and development to make CCS economically viable.

Environmental and Safety Concerns

While CCS has the potential to significantly reduce CO2 emissions, it is not without its environmental and safety challenges. The long-term storage of CO2 requires secure geological formations, and there are concerns about potential leaks that could negate the benefits of capture. Furthermore, the process of capturing, transporting, and storing CO2 consumes additional energy, which could offset some of the environmental benefits.

Despite these challenges, successful CCS projects around the world demonstrate its potential. For instance, the Sleipner project in Norway has been storing CO2 in the North Sea since 1996, providing a valuable model for future efforts.

The Future of CCS

For CCS to play a significant role in global climate policy, it needs more than just technological improvements. This includes international cooperation, favorable policy frameworks, and financial incentives to encourage investment in CCS infrastructure. Public perception and acceptance also play important roles, as communities need to understand and support CCS projects for them to succeed.

Moreover, integrating CCS with other carbon reduction strategies, such as renewable energy expansion and energy efficiency improvements, will be crucial. The synergy between these approaches could lead to more sustainable and comprehensive climate solutions.

Conclusion: Is CCS Viable Long Term?

The long-term viability of CCS will depend on a combination of technological, economic, and political factors. While CCS is not a silver bullet, it is a critical component of a multifaceted approach to addressing climate change. If supported by policies that encourage innovation and investment, CCS can provide a bridge to a low-carbon future, buying time for the development and implementation of more sustainable energy solutions. As the world continues to grapple with the realities of climate change, CCS remains an essential part of the conversation.

As clean energy and decarbonization drive new breakthroughs in hydrogen storage, CO₂ transport, and alternative gas carriers, keeping pace with technical trends and patent activity is critical to staying competitive.

Patsnap Eureka helps innovators in compressed gas storage, high-pressure tank design, gas sensor systems, and pipeline materials accelerate research by offering instant, AI-powered insights into global patents, related technologies, and emerging white spaces.

🚀 Bring speed, precision, and strategic foresight to your innovation and IP decision-making in the gas transport sector—try Eureka today and unlock a smarter path forward.

图形用户界面, 文本, 应用程序

描述已自动生成

图形用户界面, 文本, 应用程序

描述已自动生成

Features
  • R&D
  • Intellectual Property
  • Life Sciences
  • Materials
  • Tech Scout
Why Patsnap Eureka
  • Unparalleled Data Quality
  • Higher Quality Content
  • 60% Fewer Hallucinations
Social media
Patsnap Eureka Blog
Learn More