Eureka delivers breakthrough ideas for toughest innovation challenges, trusted by R&D personnel around the world.

CMOS Rolling Shutter vs Global Shutter: Artifacts in High-Speed Imaging

JUL 15, 2025 |

**Introduction to CMOS Shutters**

In high-speed imaging, the choice of shutter can greatly impact the quality of the final image. The two primary types of shutters used in CMOS sensors are the rolling shutter and the global shutter. Each has its own strengths and weaknesses, making them suitable for different applications. Understanding these differences is crucial for anyone working with high-speed imaging, whether in photography, filmmaking, or scientific research.

**Understanding Rolling Shutter**

The rolling shutter is the more common of the two in consumer-grade cameras. Rather than capturing the entire scene at once, rolling shutters read out the image line by line, vertically. This means that each line of the image is exposed at a slightly different time. While this method is cost-effective and efficient for many applications, it can introduce artifacts when capturing fast-moving objects or scenes.

One of the most noticeable artifacts in rolling shutter technology is the "jello effect," where objects appear to wobble or distort as they move across the frame. Another common artifact is the skewing of straight lines, often visible when panning quickly with the camera. These distortions occur because different parts of the image are captured at slightly different times, leading to inconsistencies in how movement is recorded.

**Benefits and Limitations of Rolling Shutter**

Despite its drawbacks, the rolling shutter is popular due to its lower cost and reduced complexity in sensor design. It typically offers higher frame rates and resolution compared to global shutters, making it ideal for many mainstream uses, such as vlogging or standard photography. However, its limitations become apparent in high-speed scenarios, where object distortion and motion artifacts can be detrimental to image quality.

**Exploring Global Shutter**

In contrast, the global shutter captures the entire scene simultaneously, akin to a single snapshot of a moment in time. This technology eliminates the distortion issues associated with rolling shutters, as all parts of the image are exposed to light at the same instance. Consequently, fast-moving objects maintain their shape and alignment within the frame, providing a more accurate representation of the scene.

Global shutters are particularly advantageous in industrial and scientific applications, where precision and accuracy are paramount. They are commonly employed in fields such as machine vision, motion analysis, and sports broadcasting, where the speed of action exceeds what a rolling shutter can accurately capture.

**Challenges of Global Shutter**

While the global shutter offers superior accuracy for high-speed imaging, it comes with its own set of challenges. Typically, cameras equipped with global shutters are more expensive due to the complexity of the sensor design. Moreover, they often have lower sensitivity to light and increased noise levels, which can be a disadvantage in low-light conditions.

**Choosing Between Rolling and Global Shutters**

When deciding between a rolling shutter and a global shutter for a particular application, several factors should be considered. For general-purpose photography and videography, where high-speed motion is not a primary concern, a rolling shutter might be perfectly adequate. However, for applications requiring precise capture of fast-moving subjects, such as scientific experiments or professional sports, the global shutter is the preferred choice.

**Conclusion**

In the realm of high-speed imaging, understanding the differences between CMOS rolling shutters and global shutters is essential. Each technology has its unique set of advantages and limitations, and the choice between them should be guided by the specific needs of the task at hand. While rolling shutters offer affordability and efficiency, global shutters provide accuracy and distortion-free images, making them indispensable in certain professional and industrial applications. Ultimately, the decision will depend on the balance between cost, image quality, and the specific requirements of the imaging task.

From interferometers and spectroradiometers to laser displacement sensors and fiber optic probes, the field of optical measurement is evolving at light speed—driven by innovations in photonics, MEMS integration, and AI-enhanced signal processing.

With Patsnap Eureka, biomedical innovators can navigate cross-domain insights in optics, electronics, and biocompatible materials, while discovering IP trends across academic, clinical, and commercial datasets.

💡 Fuel your next breakthrough in optical health tech—start using Patsnap Eureka to unlock deep insights today.

图形用户界面, 文本, 应用程序

描述已自动生成

图形用户界面, 文本, 应用程序

描述已自动生成

Features
  • R&D
  • Intellectual Property
  • Life Sciences
  • Materials
  • Tech Scout
Why Patsnap Eureka
  • Unparalleled Data Quality
  • Higher Quality Content
  • 60% Fewer Hallucinations
Social media
Patsnap Eureka Blog
Learn More