Eureka delivers breakthrough ideas for toughest innovation challenges, trusted by R&D personnel around the world.

Galvo Scanners vs. Polygon Mirrors: Speed and Accuracy for Laser Marking

JUN 26, 2025 |

Introduction to Laser Marking Technologies

Laser marking is an essential technology in various industries, from manufacturing to healthcare, providing precise and durable markings on a wide array of materials. Among the core components that determine the performance of a laser marking system are the scanning methods used to direct the laser beam. Two of the most commonly used scanning technologies are Galvo scanners and polygon mirrors. Both methods offer unique advantages and challenges when it comes to speed and accuracy. In this article, we will delve into the differences between these two technologies and explore their suitability for different laser marking applications.

Understanding Galvo Scanners

Galvo scanners, short for galvanometer scanners, utilize small mirrors mounted on galvanometers to direct the laser beam. These mirrors can rapidly tilt along two axes (X and Y) to position the laser beam accurately over the target surface. One of the critical advantages of Galvo scanners is their ability to achieve high precision and accuracy due to the precise control over the mirror angles. This makes them particularly suited for applications requiring intricate and detailed markings.

The speed of Galvo scanners is determined by the inertia of the mirrors and the efficiency of the galvanometer motors. While they offer fast scanning speeds, they may not be the fastest option available for high-volume applications. However, their accuracy often compensates for the slightly lower speed, especially in applications where precision is paramount.

Exploring Polygon Mirrors

Polygon mirrors offer a different approach to laser beam scanning. They consist of a multi-faceted rotating mirror, where each facet sequentially reflects the laser beam across the target surface. This rotation allows for continuous and rapid scanning, making polygon mirrors a preferred choice for high-speed applications.

One of the primary benefits of polygon mirrors is their ability to achieve extremely high scanning speeds, which is ideal for applications requiring quick throughput. However, this speed comes with a trade-off in terms of accuracy. The precision of a polygon mirror system is generally lower compared to Galvo scanners due to potential mechanical and alignment issues associated with the rotating mirror.

Speed versus Accuracy: Choosing the Right Technology

Deciding between Galvo scanners and polygon mirrors often boils down to the specific requirements of the laser marking application. If the primary goal is to achieve high-speed marking on less intricate designs, polygon mirrors may be the optimal choice. Industries such as packaging, where speed is crucial for high-volume production, could benefit significantly from polygon mirror systems.

On the other hand, if the application demands precision and detailed markings, Galvo scanners would be more appropriate. Industries such as aerospace, medical devices, and electronics, where accuracy is vital, often rely on Galvo systems to ensure the highest quality markings.

Versatility and Application Scenarios

Both Galvo scanners and polygon mirrors can be tailored to suit specific applications by adjusting parameters such as laser power, frequency, and scanning patterns. However, the inherent characteristics of each technology naturally align them with particular use cases.

Galvo scanners excel in applications requiring variable data, such as serial numbers or intricate logos, where each marking needs to be distinct and precise. They also perform well in tasks involving 3D surfaces or materials with varying textures, where precise control over the laser beam is crucial.

Polygon mirrors, with their rapid scanning capabilities, are ideal for applications with uniform or repetitive patterns, such as coding and marking on flat surfaces. They are frequently used in industries where speed and efficiency take precedence over intricate detail.

Conclusion

In the realm of laser marking, the choice between Galvo scanners and polygon mirrors hinges on the specific needs of the application. While polygon mirrors offer unmatched speed suitable for high-volume tasks, Galvo scanners provide superior accuracy for detailed and precise markings. Understanding the strengths and limitations of each technology allows industries to make informed decisions, ensuring optimal performance and quality in their laser marking processes. Ultimately, both technologies have their place in the diverse and expanding world of laser applications, each contributing uniquely to the advancement of precision manufacturing and product identification.

Empower Electromagnetic Innovation with Patsnap Eureka

From high-frequency antenna arrays and electromagnetic shielding to plasma propulsion and wave-based energy transfer, the electromagnetic domain sits at the core of next-generation technologies. Yet navigating its vast landscape of patents, research papers, and evolving technical standards can be time-consuming and complex.

Patsnap Eureka, our intelligent AI assistant built for R&D professionals in high-tech sectors, empowers you with real-time expert-level analysis, technology roadmap exploration, and strategic mapping of core patents—all within a seamless, user-friendly interface.

👉 Experience Patsnap Eureka today and transform how your team navigates the complexity of electromagnetic innovation.

图形用户界面, 文本, 应用程序

描述已自动生成

图形用户界面, 文本, 应用程序

描述已自动生成

Features
  • R&D
  • Intellectual Property
  • Life Sciences
  • Materials
  • Tech Scout
Why Patsnap Eureka
  • Unparalleled Data Quality
  • Higher Quality Content
  • 60% Fewer Hallucinations
Social media
Patsnap Eureka Blog
Learn More