Eureka delivers breakthrough ideas for toughest innovation challenges, trusted by R&D personnel around the world.

How to Choose Between FIR and IIR Filters for Your Project

JUN 27, 2025 |

Introduction

When it comes to digital signal processing, filters play a crucial role in manipulating signals for various applications. Two primary types of digital filters are Finite Impulse Response (FIR) and Infinite Impulse Response (IIR) filters. Choosing between them depends on numerous factors, including your project requirements, computational resources, and desired performance. In this blog, we’ll delve into the characteristics, advantages, and limitations of both FIR and IIR filters to help you make an informed decision.

Understanding FIR and IIR Filters

Before diving into the decision-making process, it’s essential to understand what FIR and IIR filters are and how they function.

FIR Filters

FIR filters are digital filters with a finite duration of response to an impulse input. This means that the output of an FIR filter settles to zero in a finite amount of time if the input is an impulse signal. FIR filters are inherently stable, as they do not have feedback mechanisms. They are also characterized by their linear phase response, which ensures that all frequency components of the input signal are shifted in time by the same amount—leading to no phase distortion.

IIR Filters

IIR filters, on the other hand, have an impulse response that theoretically extends to infinity. This is due to the presence of feedback in the filter design, which can result in recursive operations that keep the filter's response ongoing. IIR filters are generally more efficient than FIR filters in terms of the number of coefficients required to achieve a desired filter response. However, they can be unstable if not carefully designed, and they often introduce phase distortion due to their non-linear phase response.

Factors to Consider When Choosing Between FIR and IIR

Several factors influence the decision between FIR and IIR filters. Here are some key considerations:

1. Stability Requirements

If your project demands absolute stability, FIR filters are the safer choice. Their non-recursive nature means they cannot become unstable, unlike IIR filters, which can oscillate or even diverge if not properly configured.

2. Phase Linearization

For applications where phase linearity is critical, such as in data communications or audio processing, FIR filters are preferable due to their inherent linear phase response. IIR filters, while efficient, often suffer from phase distortion, which might not be suitable for these applications.

3. Computational Efficiency

IIR filters are generally more computationally efficient than FIR filters. They can achieve a desired filter response with fewer coefficients, which means less computational power and memory usage. If your project is constrained by processing power or hardware resources, IIR filters might be the better choice.

4. Filter Design Complexity

FIR filters are typically easier to design and understand, making them more suitable for projects where the design process needs to be straightforward and intuitive. IIR filters, due to their feedback system, may require more sophisticated design techniques to ensure stability and desired performance.

5. Required Filter Order

For narrowband filters, IIR designs tend to be more efficient as they require a lower filter order compared to FIR filters to achieve the same frequency response characteristics. If your project involves narrowband filtering, IIR might be the optimal choice.

6. Requirements for Real-Time Processing

In real-time systems where processing speed is crucial, IIR filters can be advantageous due to their lower computational requirements. However, the trade-off with potential instability and phase distortion must be considered.

Conclusion

Choosing between FIR and IIR filters involves examining the specific needs and constraints of your project. FIR filters offer stability and a linear phase response, making them suitable for applications where phase preservation is critical. IIR filters, with their computational efficiency and ability to achieve desired responses with fewer coefficients, can be ideal for real-time processing and systems with limited resources.

Ultimately, the decision will depend on the interplay between stability, phase requirements, computational resources, and the complexity of your filter design. By understanding the strengths and limitations of both FIR and IIR filters, you can make a choice that best aligns with your project goals and technical requirements.

Accelerate Electronic Circuit Innovation with AI-Powered Insights from Patsnap Eureka

The world of electronic circuits is evolving faster than ever—from high-speed analog signal processing to digital modulation systems, PLLs, oscillators, and cutting-edge power management ICs. For R&D engineers, IP professionals, and strategic decision-makers in this space, staying ahead of the curve means navigating a massive and rapidly growing landscape of patents, technical literature, and competitor moves.

Patsnap Eureka, our intelligent AI assistant built for R&D professionals in high-tech sectors, empowers you with real-time expert-level analysis, technology roadmap exploration, and strategic mapping of core patents—all within a seamless, user-friendly interface.

🚀 Experience the next level of innovation intelligence. Try Patsnap Eureka today and discover how AI can power your breakthroughs in electronic circuit design and strategy. Book a free trial or schedule a personalized demo now.

图形用户界面, 文本, 应用程序

描述已自动生成

图形用户界面, 文本, 应用程序

描述已自动生成

Features
  • R&D
  • Intellectual Property
  • Life Sciences
  • Materials
  • Tech Scout
Why Patsnap Eureka
  • Unparalleled Data Quality
  • Higher Quality Content
  • 60% Fewer Hallucinations
Social media
Patsnap Eureka Blog
Learn More