Supercharge Your Innovation With Domain-Expert AI Agents!

RCA Clean vs. SPM for Wafer Pre-Clean: Pros and Cons

JUL 28, 2025 |

Wafer pre-cleaning is a crucial step in semiconductor manufacturing, ensuring that the surface of a silicon wafer is free from contaminants before further processing. Two widely used methods for wafer pre-cleaning are the RCA clean and SPM (Sulphuric-Peroxide Mix). Each method has its own advantages and disadvantages. In this blog, we delve into these two cleaning processes, examining their pros and cons to help you understand which might be more suitable for specific applications.

Understanding RCA Clean

The RCA clean process, developed by Werner Kern in 1965 at RCA Laboratories, remains a standard in the semiconductor industry. It involves a sequence of chemical baths designed to remove organic, ionic, and particulate contaminants.

Pros of RCA Clean

1. Comprehensive Cleaning: The RCA clean is renowned for its ability to remove a variety of contaminants, including organic residues, metals, and particles, making it highly effective for achieving a pristine wafer surface.

2. Established Process: Given its long history in the industry, RCA clean protocols are well-established, with extensive documentation and understanding of process parameters.

3. Scalability: RCA cleaning is suitable for large-scale operations, as the process can be reliably scaled up without significant loss of effectiveness.

Cons of RCA Clean

1. Chemical Usage: RCA cleaning involves the use of multiple chemicals, such as ammonium hydroxide, hydrogen peroxide, and hydrochloric acid, which can pose handling and environmental challenges.

2. Process Complexity: The multi-step nature of RCA clean can be a downside, requiring careful control of timing, temperature, and concentration to ensure optimal results.

3. Potential for Surface Roughness: The aggressive chemical reactions involved can sometimes lead to surface roughness, which may be undesirable for certain applications demanding ultra-smooth surfaces.

Exploring SPM

SPM, or Sulfuric-Peroxide Mix, is another prevalent wafer cleaning method primarily used to remove organic contaminants. It involves a mixture of sulfuric acid and hydrogen peroxide.

Pros of SPM

1. Strong Oxidizing Agent: SPM is particularly effective at breaking down and removing organic materials, making it ideal for cleaning wafers with heavy organic contamination.

2. Simplicity: The process is relatively straightforward, involving fewer steps than RCA cleans, which can translate to reduced processing time and complexity.

3. High Throughput: Due to its simplicity and effectiveness, SPM can be advantageous for high-throughput manufacturing environments.

Cons of SPM

1. Limited Contamination Removal: SPM is less effective at removing metallic and particulate contaminants compared to RCA clean, which may limit its use to applications where organic contamination is the primary concern.

2. Chemical Consumption: The mixture of sulfuric acid and hydrogen peroxide needs careful handling and disposal, similar to the challenges faced with RCA chemicals.

3. Safety Concerns: The exothermic reaction of the SPM process can pose safety risks if not properly controlled, requiring stringent safety measures.

Choosing the Right Method for Your Needs

When deciding between RCA clean and SPM for wafer pre-clean, several factors should be considered. The type and level of contamination present on the wafers are crucial in determining the appropriate cleaning method. If comprehensive cleaning is required to remove a variety of contaminants, RCA clean might be the better choice. However, for situations where organic contamination is the primary concern, SPM offers a simpler, effective solution.

Additionally, the scale of production, environmental considerations, and specific process requirements might influence the decision. It's essential to weigh the pros and cons of each method in the context of your specific manufacturing environment to choose the most effective pre-cleaning strategy.

In summary, both RCA clean and SPM have their places in semiconductor manufacturing, each with unique strengths and limitations. Understanding these can aid in selecting the most suitable method for achieving optimal wafer cleanliness and ultimately, successful device fabrication.

As photolithography continues to push the boundaries of nanoscale patterning, from EUV and DUV advancements to multi-patterning and maskless lithography, innovation cycles are accelerating—and the IP landscape is becoming more complex than ever.

Patsnap Eureka, our intelligent AI assistant built for R&D professionals in high-tech sectors, empowers you with real-time expert-level analysis, technology roadmap exploration, and strategic mapping of core patents—all within a seamless, user-friendly interface.

Whether you're optimizing lithography depth of focus or exploring new materials for sub-3nm nodes, Patsnap Eureka empowers you to make smarter decisions, faster—combining AI efficiency with domain-specific insight.

💡 Start your free trial today and see how Eureka transforms how you discover, evaluate, and act on innovation in photolithography—from idea to impact.

图形用户界面, 文本, 应用程序

描述已自动生成

图形用户界面, 文本, 应用程序

描述已自动生成

Features
  • R&D
  • Intellectual Property
  • Life Sciences
  • Materials
  • Tech Scout
Why Patsnap Eureka
  • Unparalleled Data Quality
  • Higher Quality Content
  • 60% Fewer Hallucinations
Social media
Patsnap Eureka Blog
Learn More