Eureka delivers breakthrough ideas for toughest innovation challenges, trusted by R&D personnel around the world.

SPM vs. AFM vs. STM: What’s the Difference in Surface Inspection?

JUL 8, 2025 |

Introduction to Surface Inspection Techniques

In the realm of surface inspection and nanoscale analysis, Scanning Probe Microscopy (SPM), Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM), and Scanning Tunneling Microscopy (STM) are pivotal techniques, each with unique capabilities and applications. These methods are instrumental in fields ranging from materials science to semiconductor manufacturing, providing insights into the properties, topography, and behavior of surfaces at the atomic level. Understanding the differences between these techniques is crucial for selecting the appropriate method for specific surface inspection needs.

Understanding Scanning Probe Microscopy (SPM)

Scanning Probe Microscopy (SPM) is a family of microscopic techniques that investigates surfaces using a physical probe. It encompasses a variety of methodologies, including AFM and STM, and is renowned for its exceptional spatial resolution. SPM techniques are particularly advantageous for analyzing non-conductive and conductive surfaces, making them versatile tools in research and industry.

The core principle of SPM involves scanning a sharp probe over a surface while measuring interactions such as forces, currents, or potentials between the probe and the surface. This approach allows for the creation of detailed topographic maps and the examination of surface properties at the nanoscale.

Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM): Precision in Force Measurement

Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) is a type of SPM that utilizes a cantilever with a sharp tip to interact with the sample surface. The forces between the tip and the surface cause deflections in the cantilever, which are measured by a laser reflected off the cantilever into a photodetector. AFM excels in measuring surface roughness, hardness, and mechanical properties due to its sensitivity to force interactions.

AFM operates in several modes, including contact mode, tapping mode, and non-contact mode, each suited to different types of analysis. This versatility makes AFM a preferred choice for inspecting biological samples, polymers, and soft materials where non-destructive imaging is essential.

Scanning Tunneling Microscopy (STM): Quantum Precision in Conductive Surfaces

Scanning Tunneling Microscopy (STM), another subset of SPM, relies on quantum tunneling to generate images of conductive surfaces. A conductive tip is brought close to the sample surface, and a bias voltage is applied, inducing a tunneling current that varies with distance. By scanning the tip across the surface and maintaining a constant current, STM generates atomic-resolution images.

STM is particularly effective for studying conductive materials and surfaces, providing valuable insights into electronic properties and surface reconstructions. Its ability to manipulate individual atoms and molecules has positioned it as a powerful tool in nanotechnology and surface science.

Comparative Analysis of SPM, AFM, and STM

While SPM serves as an overarching category, AFM and STM are specialized techniques with distinct applications. AFM is favored for its ability to analyze both conductive and non-conductive surfaces, offering flexibility in materials research. Its force measurement capabilities make it ideal for examining mechanical properties and surface topography.

In contrast, STM's strength lies in its atomic-resolution imaging of conductive surfaces and its ability to probe electronic structures. It is suitable for studying metals, semiconductors, and other conductive materials where electronic properties are of interest.

Choosing the Right Technique for Surface Inspection

The choice between AFM and STM depends on the nature of the sample and the specific information required. For comprehensive surface analysis involving both topographic and mechanical properties, AFM is the go-to method. For exploring electronic characteristics and atomic-scale features on conductive surfaces, STM is unparalleled.

In practice, the selection of a surface inspection technique is guided by the sample's conductivity, the required resolution, and the type of data needed. Advanced research often employs a combination of these methods to achieve a comprehensive understanding of surface characteristics.

Conclusion

SPM, AFM, and STM are indispensable tools in surface inspection, each offering unique advantages and addressing specific analytical needs. Understanding their differences and capabilities allows researchers and engineers to harness these techniques effectively, pushing the boundaries of what is possible in nanoscale analysis and materials characterization. As technology advances, these methods will continue to evolve, opening new avenues for exploration and innovation in various scientific and industrial domains.

Infuse Insights into Chip R&D with PatSnap Eureka

Whether you're exploring novel transistor architectures, monitoring global IP filings in advanced packaging, or optimizing your semiconductor innovation roadmap—Patsnap Eureka empowers you with AI-driven insights tailored to the pace and complexity of modern chip development.

Patsnap Eureka, our intelligent AI assistant built for R&D professionals in high-tech sectors, empowers you with real-time expert-level analysis, technology roadmap exploration, and strategic mapping of core patents—all within a seamless, user-friendly interface.

👉 Join the new era of semiconductor R&D. Try Patsnap Eureka today and experience the future of innovation intelligence.

图形用户界面, 文本, 应用程序

描述已自动生成

图形用户界面, 文本, 应用程序

描述已自动生成

Features
  • R&D
  • Intellectual Property
  • Life Sciences
  • Materials
  • Tech Scout
Why Patsnap Eureka
  • Unparalleled Data Quality
  • Higher Quality Content
  • 60% Fewer Hallucinations
Social media
Patsnap Eureka Blog
Learn More