Eureka delivers breakthrough ideas for toughest innovation challenges, trusted by R&D personnel around the world.

UL 1973 vs. IEC 62619: Key Differences in Stationary Storage Safety Tests

JUN 20, 2025 |

Introduction

As the demand for renewable energy grows, the importance of energy storage systems has skyrocketed. These systems ensure a reliable and efficient energy supply, but they also come with their own set of risks. Safety standards, therefore, play a crucial role in mitigating these risks, particularly for stationary storage systems. Among the prominent standards are UL 1973 and IEC 62619. Although both address safety requirements for energy storage systems, they differ in several key aspects.

Understanding UL 1973

UL 1973, developed by Underwriters Laboratories, is primarily focused on the safety of stationary batteries and battery systems used in various applications, including renewable energy storage, peak shaving, and UPS systems. It provides a comprehensive framework for evaluating the safety of these systems against potential hazards such as fire, electric shock, and mechanical failures.

Safety Evaluations and Tests

UL 1973 includes a range of tests to ensure the safety of stationary storage systems. These tests assess the battery's ability to withstand abnormal conditions, such as overcharging, short-circuiting, and thermal runaway. Additionally, the standard examines the mechanical integrity of the system, ensuring it can endure environmental stresses without compromising safety.

Focus on Materials and Construction

Another significant aspect of UL 1973 is its attention to the materials and construction of battery systems. The standard mandates rigorous evaluations of the materials used, focusing on their flammability, toxicity, and corrosion resistance. This ensures that the battery system can safely operate over its entire lifespan.

Exploring IEC 62619

IEC 62619, established by the International Electrotechnical Commission, provides guidelines for safety requirements specifically for secondary lithium cells and batteries used in industrial applications. The standard is particularly relevant for batteries that are used in stationary applications such as energy storage in renewable systems.

Emphasis on Lithium Technology

IEC 62619 differs from UL 1973 in its specific focus on lithium technology. The standard includes detailed requirements for the design, construction, and testing of lithium batteries, recognizing the unique challenges and risks associated with this type of technology. This includes thermal stability, overcharge protection, and cell venting mechanisms.

Testing Procedures and Parameters

IEC 62619 outlines a series of tests designed to assess the safety and performance of lithium batteries under various conditions. These tests evaluate parameters such as charge retention, discharge performance, and the ability to withstand external shocks. The goal is to ensure the battery's reliability and safety in real-world applications.

Comparative Analysis: UL 1973 vs IEC 62619

Scope and Application

The most apparent difference between UL 1973 and IEC 62619 is their scope and application. UL 1973 has a broader focus, addressing various types of stationary battery systems, while IEC 62619 is more specialized, concentrating specifically on lithium-based technologies. This distinction is crucial for manufacturers when choosing the appropriate standard for their products.

Testing and Safety Focus

While both standards emphasize safety, their testing methodologies and focal points vary. UL 1973 covers a wider range of tests for different battery technologies, whereas IEC 62619 delves deeply into the specifics of lithium batteries, including cell design and safety mechanisms. This difference may influence the choice of standard depending on the technology used in the battery system.

Material and Construction Considerations

UL 1973 provides extensive guidelines regarding materials and construction, ensuring that the entire system is safe and reliable. IEC 62619, on the other hand, focuses more on the technological aspects of lithium batteries, acknowledging the unique risks associated with these materials. Manufacturers must consider these factors when designing their systems to comply with either standard.

Conclusion

Both UL 1973 and IEC 62619 play vital roles in ensuring the safety of stationary storage systems, yet they cater to different needs within the industry. Understanding the key differences between these standards is essential for manufacturers and engineers seeking to design and implement safe and reliable energy storage solutions. As the industry continues to evolve, staying informed about these standards will be crucial for maintaining high safety and performance levels in energy storage systems.

Accelerate Breakthroughs in Fuel Cell and Battery Innovation—with the Power of AI

From solid-state battery breakthroughs to high-efficiency hydrogen fuel cells, keeping pace with fast-evolving chemistries, global patent landscapes, and emerging application pathways is an ever-growing challenge for R&D and IP professionals.

Patsnap Eureka, our intelligent AI assistant built for R&D professionals in high-tech sectors, empowers you with real-time expert-level analysis, technology roadmap exploration, and strategic mapping of core patents—all within a seamless, user-friendly interface.

Whether you're optimizing cathode formulations, evaluating electrolyte stability, or navigating the crowded patent space around battery pack design, Eureka empowers you to move faster and with greater confidence.

Start your journey with Patsnap Eureka today—streamline your research, enhance decision-making, and power the future of energy with AI-driven clarity.

图形用户界面, 文本, 应用程序

描述已自动生成

图形用户界面, 文本, 应用程序

描述已自动生成

Features
  • R&D
  • Intellectual Property
  • Life Sciences
  • Materials
  • Tech Scout
Why Patsnap Eureka
  • Unparalleled Data Quality
  • Higher Quality Content
  • 60% Fewer Hallucinations
Social media
Patsnap Eureka Blog
Learn More