← Back to the page you were readingYou opened this term from another page.
IP · ProsecutionTask: Draft and prosecute

Patent term extension (PTE)

Also called PTE, patent term restoration, 35 U.S.C. 156 extension, Hatch-Waxman patent extension

Published by Patsnap Team Updated 6 sources
DefinitionPTE

Patent term extension (PTE) is an extension of the term of a US patent under 35 U.S.C. 156, restoring part of the time lost while the patented product awaited premarket regulatory approval1,2.

It applies to patents that claim certain human drug products, medical devices, animal drug products, veterinary biological products, and food or color additives, or methods of using or making them1,2. The right to PTE results from the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984, known as the Hatch-Waxman Act2.

Used byThe owner of record of the patent, or its agent1
Comes upWithin 60 days beginning on the date the product received permission for commercial marketing or use, with limited exceptions1
Governed by35 U.S.C. 156 and MPEP 2750 et seq.1,2
Not to confuse withPatent term adjustment under 35 U.S.C. 154(b), which offsets delays in issuing the patent3
01

What qualifies for extension

The patent must claim a product, a method of using a product, or a method of manufacturing a product, and the product must have been subject to a regulatory review period before its commercial marketing or use1.

  • Covered products. A product is a drug product, or any medical device, food additive or color additive subject to regulation under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. A drug product is the active ingredient of a new drug, antibiotic drug or human biological product, or of a new animal drug or veterinary biological product not primarily made by recombinant DNA and similar techniques, including any salt or ester, alone or in combination (35 U.S.C. 156(f))1.
  • Conditions. The patent's term must not have expired before the application is submitted, and must never have been extended under section 156(e)(1). The application must be submitted by the owner of record or its agent in accordance with section 156(d). The permission for commercial marketing or use after the regulatory review period must be the first permitted commercial marketing or use of the product under the law under which the review occurred, subject to exceptions for certain recombinant DNA manufacturing patents and certain animal drugs (35 U.S.C. 156(a))1.
  • One patent per review period. In no event may more than one patent be extended for the same regulatory review period for any product (35 U.S.C. 156(c)(4))1.
  • Active ingredient. For human drugs, FDA says the product is the active ingredient, which is not the same as the active moiety. A new ester or salt of a previously approved acid is eligible, and a new acid of a previously approved salt or ester is not5.
  • Devices. The USPTO says a regulatory review period under section 510(k) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act does not give rise to eligibility for extension4.
02

How an extension is obtained

  1. ApplicationThe owner of record of the patent or its agent submits an application to the Director of the USPTO1. With limited exceptions set out in the statute, it may only be submitted within the 60-day period beginning on the date the product received permission, under the law governing the regulatory review period, for commercial marketing or use1. It must identify the approved product, the patent and each claim that claims the product or a method of using or manufacturing it, and the activities undertaken during the regulatory review period1.
  2. Regulatory review period determinationWithin 60 days of the application the Director notifies the Secretary of Health and Human Services, for patents claiming a drug product, medical device, food additive or color additive subject to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act1. Not later than 30 days after receipt, the Secretary reviews the dates, determines the applicable regulatory review period and publishes a notice in the Federal Register1. FDA says its role is to assist the USPTO with eligibility and the regulatory review period, and that the USPTO determines the period of extension5.
  3. Due diligence challengeA petition may be submitted to FDA not later than 180 days after publication of the determination, on the ground that the applicant did not act with due diligence during the regulatory review period1. Any period in which the applicant did not act with due diligence reduces the extension1.
  4. Certificate of extensionThe Director may determine that a patent is eligible solely on the basis of the representations in the application. If the patent is eligible and the application requirements are met, the Director issues a certificate of extension, which is recorded in the official file and is part of the original patent1.
  5. Interim extensionsIf the patent would expire before a certificate of extension is issued or denied, the Director extends its term for periods of up to one year if the patent is eligible1. Separately, an owner who reasonably expects the approval phase of the regulatory review period to extend beyond the patent's expiry may apply for an interim extension in the period beginning 6 months, and ending 15 days, before the term expires1.
03

How long the extension is

  • Basis. The extension equals the regulatory review period for the approved product that occurs after the patent issued, reduced by any period in which the applicant did not act with due diligence (35 U.S.C. 156(c)(1))1.
  • Half the testing phase. After that reduction the extension includes only one-half of the time remaining in the first of the two periods that make up a regulatory review period (35 U.S.C. 156(c)(2))1. For a human drug FDA calls these the testing phase, from the effective date of the investigational exemption to the initial submission of the marketing application, and the approval phase, from submission to approval5.
  • Five-year cap. For a patent issued after the date of enactment of section 156, the extension may not exceed five years. For a human drug product, medical device, food additive or color additive that date is September 24, 1984 (35 U.S.C. 156(g)(6)(A), (f)(7))1.
  • Fourteen-year cap. If the term remaining after approval, added to the revised regulatory review period, exceeds fourteen years, the extension is reduced so that the total does not exceed fourteen years (35 U.S.C. 156(c)(3))1. FDA says a product whose patent life after approval is 14 or more years is not eligible5.
  • Starting point. The extension runs from the original expiration date of the patent, which includes any patent term adjustment (35 U.S.C. 156(a))1.
  • Scope of rights. During the extension, rights under a patent claiming a product are limited to uses approved for the product, and rights under a method-of-use patent are limited to uses claimed by the patent and approved for the product. Rights under a method-of-manufacture patent are limited to the method as used to make the approved product (35 U.S.C. 156(b))1.
04

PTE vs patent term adjustment

Both lengthen a US patent's term, but for different reasons and under different statutes1,3. See also Supplementary protection certificate.

Patent term extensionPatent term adjustment
Why it existsRestores time lost while a product underwent a regulatory review period before commercial marketing or use1,2Extends the term one day for each day the issue of an original patent is delayed by USPTO failures to meet examination time limits or to issue the patent within 3 years of filing, by derivation proceedings, secrecy orders or appeals3
Statute35 U.S.C. 156135 U.S.C. 154(b)3
LimitNo more than five years, and no more than fourteen years of total term after approval1Overlapping delay counts once, and the adjustment is reduced for time the applicant failed to engage in reasonable efforts to conclude prosecution3
How they combineRuns from the original expiration date, which includes any patent term adjustment1Is included in the original expiration date from which any extension runs1
05

Seen in the record

The Federal Register notice below is an FDA determination of a regulatory review period, made after an extension application reached the USPTO. It is shown for how the period is stated, and says nothing about the applicant or the patents beyond the record.

FDA noticeRegulatory review period determination

Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; MONOFERRIC

Published 9 Oct 20263,292 days in totalTesting phase 2,990 daysApproval phase 302 days

FDA determined a regulatory review period of 3,292 days for a human drug product: 2,990 days in the testing phase and 302 days in the approval phase. The notice says this is the maximum potential length of an extension, because the USPTO applies statutory limitations, and records that the applicant seeks 1,136 days6.

Read how the review period is split into two phases.Open the record →
Patsnap EurekaEureka IP

Check a product

FTO Search AI Agent

An AI agent that finds in-force patents that could read on your product, with a claim chart for each one.

Run FTO Search
06

Questions people ask

How long can a patent term extension be?

By statute the extension may not exceed five years for a patent issued after the date of enactment of section 156, and it is reduced if the term remaining after approval plus the qualifying review period would exceed fourteen years1. Only half of the testing phase counts toward the extension1,5.

Who applies for PTE, and by when?

The owner of record of the patent or its agent applies to the USPTO1. With limited exceptions set out in the statute, the application may only be submitted within the 60-day period beginning on the date the product received permission for commercial marketing or use1.

Can every patent on an approved drug be extended?

No. The patent must claim the approved product or a method of using or manufacturing it, must not have expired or been extended before, and the approval must be the first permitted commercial marketing or use of the product1. Only one patent may be extended for the same regulatory review period for any product1.

Is patent term extension the same as patent term adjustment?

No. Patent term adjustment under 35 U.S.C. 154(b) offsets delays in issuing the patent3. Patent term extension under 35 U.S.C. 156 is for products that went through a regulatory review period, and it runs from an expiration date that already includes any adjustment1.

07

How it connects

Next step

Go from the term to the task

Read how the method works, run it on your own product or idea, then try a free tool.

  • 01 / How-toThe Keytruda patent cliff: Merck's 2028 strategyHow a blockbuster's patent estate shapes generic and biosimilar entry.GuideRead
  • 02 / AI agentNovelty Search AI AgentAn AI agent that searches prior art for your invention and compares each reference with it feature by feature.Patsnap EurekaRun it
  • 03 / Free toolPatent draft style studioRewrite a technical description in claim language.AI resultTry tool

More next stepsHow to research pharma pipelines with AI

PublishedPatsnap Team
Updated 27 October 2026
Sources
  1. 35 U.S. Code § 156: Extension of patent term. Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School. Accessed 21 October 2026.
  2. Patent Term Extension (PTE) Under 35 U.S.C. 156. United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Accessed 21 October 2026.
  3. 35 U.S. Code § 154: Contents and term of patent; provisional rights. Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School. Accessed 21 October 2026.
  4. MPEP 2751: Eligibility Requirements [R-01.2024]. United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Accessed 21 October 2026.
  5. Small Business Assistance: Frequently Asked Questions on the Patent Term Restoration Program. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Accessed 21 October 2026.
  6. Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; MONOFERRIC. Federal Register (FDA notice, 2026-20766). Accessed 21 October 2026.
Disclaimer

General information only. This page explains a term for general information and reference only. It is not legal, accounting, tax or other professional advice and must not be relied upon as such. It does not create an attorney-client or other professional relationship.

Sources and accuracy. Statements on this page are intended to be either general background or linked to a source listed under Sources. The explanations summarize and simplify those sources and leave out detail. Where this page differs from a cited source or from the current official text of a law or standard, rely on that source or text. To the extent permitted by law, this page is provided as is, without any warranty that it is complete, accurate or current, and Patsnap accepts no liability for loss arising from reliance on it. See also Patsnap’s website Disclaimer.

Rules vary and change. The law, standards and practice described here differ between jurisdictions and change through legislation, court decisions and revisions to official guidance and standards. This page was last checked against its sources on 27 October 2026 and may not reflect later changes. Check the current rules and official guidance in each jurisdiction that applies to you.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Cases and records as examples. Court decisions, dockets, agency decisions and official reports are cited to show how a term is used, and are summarized rather than reproduced in full. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed, beyond what the cited record or decision itself states.

Third-party names, marks and links. Names of courts, government bodies, parties, people, companies, standards and products appear for identification only. Some of these names are trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap. Links to third-party sources are provided for reference, and Patsnap is not responsible for their content or availability.

Patsnap Eureka. Patsnap publishes this glossary and also offers Patsnap Eureka, a commercial product mentioned on this page. Those mentions describe what its tools are designed to do, not what they will find in a particular case. Their outputs are research aids and should be reviewed by a qualified professional before being relied on.

Corrections and requests. If you believe a statement on this page is inaccurate or out of date, use “Share feedback” at the bottom of this page and tell us which statement and why. If you are named on this page, or your concern is about legal rights or personal information, email legal@patsnap.com. We review reports and may correct or update the page.

FTO Search AI AgentRun FTO Search in Patsnap EurekaStart →

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.