Recursive Block Image Coding for 360-Degree Projection Compression

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image processing systems struggle with the massive data generated for 360-degree images in virtual and augmented reality, necessitating improved performance in image encoding and decoding, particularly for high-resolution and high-quality images.

Innovation Solution

A method for encoding and decoding 360-degree images that includes generating a predicted image using syntax information, combining it with a residual image, and reconstructing the image in various projection formats, such as Equi-Rectangular, CubeMap, OctaHedron, and IcoSahedral, to enhance compression performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional image encoding/decoding methods are used for 360-degree images, then the processing can be performed with standard algorithms, but the performance is insufficient for handling massive data volumes of high-resolution images

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage processing performanceVSAvoiddata volume
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the 360-degree image into multiple projection formats (ERP, CMP, OHP, ISP) and processes each format separately with format-specific optimization. The image is segmented into different regions that can be encoded with different parameters, allowing efficient handling of large data volumes through divided processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different encoding parameters and quality settings to different regions and projection formats of the 360-degree image. Each projection format (ERP, CMP, OHP, ISP) can have customized encoding settings, allowing high quality where needed while reducing data volume in less critical areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Manufacturing precision

If high-resolution encoding is applied to maintain image quality, then the quality of decoded image is improved, but the compression performance deteriorates due to increased data volume

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidcompression performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes encoding parameters based on the projection format and image characteristics. Different quantization parameters, transformation blocks, and prediction modes are applied to different projection formats (ERP, CMP, OHP, ISP) to achieve optimal balance between quality and compression ratio for each format.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

Different quality levels and encoding parameters are applied to different regions corresponding to different projection formats. This allows high-resolution encoding for formats requiring high quality while using more aggressive compression for other formats, maintaining overall image quality while improving compression performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple projection formats are supported for versatile application, then the adaptability is improved, but the device complexity increases due to multiple processing paths

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprojection format compatibilityVSAvoidprocessing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal encoding framework that handles multiple projection formats (ERP, CMP, OHP, ISP) through a common architecture. The system can select and process different formats using the same basic encoding infrastructure, reducing complexity compared to implementing separate processing systems for each format.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The processing system is segmented into modular components that can independently handle different projection formats. Each format has its own optimized processing path, but all paths converge on a common framework, allowing versatility without proportionally increasing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12401775B2Image data encoding/decoding method and apparatus
Publication Date: 2025.08.26 INST OF IMAGE TECH INC
  • US12401775B2 patent drawing
  • US12401775B2 patent drawing
  • US12401775B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are methods and apparatuses for decoding an image. A method includes receiving a bitstream obtained by encoding the image; dividing a first coding block into a plurality of second coding blocks; generating a prediction block of a second coding block based on syntax information obtained from the bitstream; and reconstructing the second coding block based on the prediction block and a residual block of the second coding block, the residual block being obtained by performing a dequantization and an inverse-transform on quantized transform coefficients from the bitstream. The first coding block has a recursive division structure. The first coding block is divided based on at least one of a quad tree division, a binary tree division or a triple tree division.