3D NAND Memory Finger Layout With Top Selective Gate Cut

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

As feature sizes of planar memory cells approach their limits, scaling becomes challenging and costly, and 3D memory devices are needed to increase density without increasing wafer size, while maintaining storage capacity.

Innovation Solution

A method for forming a 3D memory device involves creating an alternating dielectric stack, forming channel holes, and simultaneously constructing channel structures and a top selective gate cut structure, allowing for reduced wafer size without compromising storage capacity by rearranging channel structures and using a sacrificial wall for precise etching and filling processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If nine rows of channel holes are arranged in a staggered manner in existing 3D NAND memory devices, then storage capacity is maintained, but wafer size becomes large

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage capacityVSAvoidwafer size
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from a conventional planar arrangement of channel holes to a three-dimensional stacked architecture. By forming multiple layers of channel holes vertically (e.g., first set in lower dielectric layers, second set in upper dielectric layers), the design achieves higher storage capacity without increasing the lateral wafer area. This vertical stacking approach fundamentally changes the spatial dimensionality of the memory structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The memory device is divided into multiple independent memory fingers, where each finger contains a manageable number of channel holes (e.g., four rows per finger). This segmentation allows the overall storage capacity to be achieved through parallel arrays of smaller, more compact units rather than requiring a single large array, thereby reducing the required wafer size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Quantity of substance

If planar memory cells are scaled to smaller sizes by improving process technology, then density increases, but manufacturing complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvememory densityVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of continuing to scale planar memory cells to smaller feature sizes, the patent transitions to a three-dimensional vertical stacking architecture. This approach achieves higher memory density by utilizing the vertical dimension rather than further reducing lateral dimensions, thereby avoiding the exponential increase in process complexity and cost associated with continued planar scaling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Area of stationary object

If wafer size is reduced without changing storage capacity, then device size decreases, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewafer sizeVSAvoidetching precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the memory structure into multiple fingers with fewer channel holes per finger (e.g., four rows instead of nine). This segmentation reduces the lateral spacing requirements and allows for more relaxed etching precision requirements while maintaining overall storage capacity through vertical stacking and parallel finger arrays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

By moving to vertical stacking of channel holes in multiple dielectric layers, the patent reduces the lateral footprint of each memory finger. This dimensional transition allows smaller wafer sizes without proportionally increasing etching precision requirements, as the critical dimensions are managed in the vertical stacking process rather than lateral patterning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS11871567B2Three-dimensional memory devices and fabricating methods thereof
Publication Date: 2024.01.09 YANGTZE MEMORY TECH CO LTD
  • US11871567B2 patent drawing
  • US11871567B2 patent drawing
  • US11871567B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A three-dimensional (3D) memory device is disclosed. The 3D memory device comprises an alternating layer stack on a substrate, and a top selective gate cut structure having a laminated structure embedded in an upper portion of the alternating layer stack and extending along a lateral direction. The laminated structure of the top selective gate cut structure comprises a dielectric filling wall and a dummy channel and a dummy functional layer on both sides of the dielectric filling wall.