3D Semiconductor Pattern Yield Risk Scoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current 2D simulation methods fail to accurately capture risks associated with inter- or intra-layer spacing in semiconductor patterns, limiting their effectiveness in predicting yield and device performance, especially at the 22 nanometer technology node and beyond.

Innovation Solution

A 3D simulation method that generates yield scores by comparing critical dimensions between or within layers of semiconductor patterns with predefined minimum dimensions, normalizing these scores to a volume, and translating them into a risk factor, allowing for the identification and substitution of at-risk patterns with lower-risk alternatives.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If 2D simulation is used for design, then design optimization is enabled, but manufacturing risk assessment is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing risk assessmentVSAvoidyield prediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from 2D simulation to 3D simulation to capture vertical dimensional information including inter-layer and intra-layer spacing. This dimensional change enables accurate modeling of critical dimensions in three-dimensional semiconductor structures, providing comprehensive manufacturing risk assessment that 2D simulations cannot achieve.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If 3D simulation is implemented, then manufacturing risk assessment is improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveyield prediction accuracyVSAvoidsimulation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the semiconductor structure into multiple layers and extracts critical dimensions from each layer separately. By dividing the complex 3D structure into manageable components (inter-layer spacing between adjacent layers, intra-layer spacing within layers), the simulation can process each segment independently, reducing overall computational complexity while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Manufacturing precision

If critical dimensions are measured in 3D, then spacing risks are captured, but measurement precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecritical dimension measurementVSAvoiddistance measurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses 3D simulation as an intermediary to obtain critical dimension measurements. Instead of directly measuring physical structures (which would require extremely precise physical measurement equipment), the simulation models the semiconductor patterns and extracts dimensional information computationally, achieving accurate measurement of inter-layer and intra-layer spacing without direct physical measurement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10311186B2Three-dimensional pattern risk scoring
Publication Date: 2019.06.04 TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD
  • US10311186B2 patent drawing
  • US10311186B2 patent drawing
  • US10311186B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methodologies and a device for assessing integrated circuit and pattern for yield risk based on 3D simulation of semiconductor patterns are provided. Embodiments include generating, with a processor, a 3D simulation of semiconductor patterns; obtaining critical dimensions of distances between layers or within a layer of the 3D simulation of semiconductor patterns; comparing the set of critical dimensions with predefined minimum dimensions; and yield scoring each of the semiconductor patterns of the 3D simulation based on the comparing step.