3D Woven Fibrous Reinforcement for Composite Articulation Ends

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing composite materials for aircraft parts, such as landing gear struts, suffer from increased stress concentration, delamination risk, high manual labor requirements, and suboptimal mechanical performance, particularly in compressive strength, leading to inefficiencies in mass savings and integration.

Innovation Solution

A fibrous preform with a core-belt assembly design using three-dimensional weaving, featuring varying yarn ratios and thicknesses at articulation ends to enhance mechanical performance and reduce manual labor, while maintaining a consistent number of layers and minimizing non-conformities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a laminated structure with intercalation of plies is used to form articulation forks, then the risk of delamination is reduced, but the size of stress introduction areas increases and mass saving is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelamination riskVSAvoidstress introduction area size
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a three-dimensional woven composite structure instead of a laminated structure. The 3D weaving creates interlaced yarns that extend in multiple directions (longitudinal, transverse, and diagonal), forming a monolithic structure that resists delamination without requiring increased ply intercalation. This maintains smaller stress introduction area sizes while ensuring structural reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from a two-dimensional laminated structure to a three-dimensional woven structure. The yarns are arranged in three dimensions with longitudinal yarns extending along the length, transverse yarns crossing perpendicular to the longitudinal direction, and diagonal yarns providing additional reinforcement. This 3D arrangement creates inherent resistance to delamination through spatial interlacing rather than through increased lamination thickness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Manufacturing precision

If manual work is increased to achieve precise fiber placement, then manufacturing precision improves, but production cost and time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefiber placement precisionVSAvoidproduction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the manufacturing approach from manual fiber placement to automated 3D weaving. By adjusting weaving parameters such as yarn density, weave pattern, and tension during the weaving process, the desired fiber distribution and structural properties are achieved automatically. This eliminates manual intervention while maintaining precise fiber placement through controlled mechanical weaving operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical fiber placement operations with an automated 3D weaving mechanical system. The weaving machine uses programmed motion control to guide yarns through complex three-dimensional paths, automatically creating the desired reinforcement structure. This substitution of manual labor with automated machinery improves both precision and productivity simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Strength

If material is added in the common area to improve compressive strength, then mechanical performance improves, but mass increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompressive strengthVSAvoidpart mass
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different yarn densities and configurations in different regions of the structure. In the common area subjected to compressive loads, the 3D weaving pattern is optimized with appropriate yarn spacing and tension to provide sufficient compressive strength. In articulation areas, the yarn arrangement is adjusted to handle bending and shear stresses. This localized optimization ensures adequate strength throughout without adding unnecessary material mass.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes the inherent properties of three-dimensional woven composite materials to achieve efficient load distribution. The interlaced yarn structure in three dimensions provides multi-directional reinforcement that resists compressive, tensile, and shear stresses simultaneously. This composite structure delivers the required compressive strength in the common area without requiring additional material layers, thereby avoiding mass increase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS20250381741A1Fibrous reinforcement for the manufacture of a composite part intended to be articulated with other parts
Publication Date: 2025.12.18 SAFRAN LANDING SYSTEMS
  • US20250381741A1 patent drawing
  • US20250381741A1 patent drawing
  • US20250381741A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A fibrous preform of a core portion of a fibrous reinforcement for a composite material part, the preform having an elongate shape along a longitudinal direction and being formed by three-dimensional weaving of first yarns extending along the longitudinal direction with second yarns transverse to the first yarns, the preform including two longitudinal ends for articulation with other parts and a median area located between the longitudinal ends, each longitudinal end having a thickness greater than a thickness of the median area, the median area having a first volume ratio of first yarns to second yarns that is greater than one, and each longitudinal end having a second volume ratio of first yarns to second yarns that is less than the first ratio and closer to one than this first ratio.