Abrasive Article Production with Gas Pulses for Uniform Grain Distribution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing abrasive article production methods struggle to evenly distribute finely particulate substances, particularly abrasive grains, due to agglomeration, leading to clogging and uneven surfaces, which limits the effectiveness of grinding processes.

Innovation Solution

The process employs gas pressure pulses to deagglomerate particulate substances, such as abrasive grains, into individual grains, which are then sprinkled onto an abrasive article substrate using electrostatic or gravitational methods, ensuring uniform distribution and reducing agglomeration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If abrasive grains are sprinkled onto the abrasive article substrate, then the abrasive article is formed, but agglomeration of particulate substance occurs leading to uneven distribution and clogging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuniformity of abrasive grain distributionVSAvoidagglomeration and clogging
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the conventional mechanical sprinkling system with an electrostatic field-based deposition system. Particulate substance is charged and deposited onto the substrate through electrostatic attraction, eliminating the need for mechanical force and preventing agglomeration caused by mechanical impact. This substitution enables uniform distribution of abrasive grains without clogging.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the physical state and distribution parameters of the particulate substance by controlling electrostatic charge, electric field strength, and deposition conditions. By adjusting these parameters, the system achieves controlled, uniform deposition of abrasive grains at varying densities, preventing agglomeration while maintaining manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If a closed surface of abrasive grains is produced, then fine abrasive articles with low peak-to-valley heights are achieved, but chip removal space is reduced leading to clogging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface flatness (peak-to-valley height)VSAvoidchip clogging
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating regions of varying abrasive grain density across the substrate surface. The electrostatic field distribution is controlled to produce areas with different concentrations of abrasive grains, allowing certain regions to maintain closed surfaces for flatness while other regions provide open spaces for chip removal, thus resolving the contradiction between surface quality and chip evacuation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic control of the electrostatic field parameters during the deposition process, allowing the abrasive grain distribution pattern to be adjusted and optimized. This dynamic approach enables the system to balance surface flatness requirements with chip removal space requirements by varying deposition conditions in different regions or during different stages of the process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of manufacture

If conventional sprinkling methods are used, then the production process is simple, but agglomeration prevents open scattering and uniform distribution

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess simplicityVSAvoiduniformity of grain distribution
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the simple but ineffective mechanical sprinkling method with an electrostatic field-based deposition system. While the equipment complexity increases, the process remains relatively straightforward in operation, and the results dramatically improve uniformity of grain distribution by eliminating agglomeration through charge-based deposition rather than mechanical force.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method allows for the production of abrasive articles with an open, uniformly distributed surface, reducing the risk of clogging and enhancing grinding efficiency by providing spaces between grains for chip removal.

Implementation Method 1

The particulate substance is deagglomerated by gas pressure pulses, in particular to give individual grains

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas pressure pulses: Pressure Increase

Implementation Method 2

the deagglomerated particulate substance, in particular the individual grains, is/are sprinkled onto the abrasive article substrate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic deposition: Electrostatic Deposition

Data Source

PatentUS12390902B2Method for producing an abrasive article, and abrasive article
Publication Date: 2025.08.19 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US12390902B2 patent drawing
  • US12390902B2 patent drawing
  • US12390902B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure relates to a method for producing an abrasive article, in which method a granular substance is scattered onto an abrasive article substrate that is coated with a binder, wherein the granular substance is deagglomerated by gas pulses and the deagglomerated granular substance is scattered onto the abrasive article substrate. The disclosure further relates to a correspondingly produced abrasive article.