Acetone Drying via Supercritical CO2 Phase Separation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional acetone drying methods are not economically viable or environmentally friendly at large scales due to high volatile organic compound emissions and capital expenses associated with distillation processes, limiting their application in commercial settings.

Innovation Solution

A process involving acetone-drying of hydrated feedstock at ambient temperature using carbon dioxide to separate and recover acetone without distillation, allowing for efficient dehydration and re-use of acetone, and capturing and reusing carbon dioxide.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If acetone drying is performed at large scale using conventional distillation to separate acetone from water, then dehydration efficiency is improved, but capital expenses and operating costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedehydration efficiencyVSAvoidcapital expenses
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention uses phase transition of carbon dioxide between supercritical and gas phases to achieve separation. By converting CO2 to a supercritical state and then allowing it to expand to gas phase, the system naturally separates acetone-rich liquid from CO2 gas without requiring complex distillation equipment, thereby reducing capital expenses while maintaining dehydration efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #36Phase transitions

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes physical parameters (temperature and pressure) of carbon dioxide to control its phase state. By adjusting CO2 to supercritical conditions during extraction and then allowing pressure reduction for gas phase expansion, the system achieves efficient separation and acetone recovery without expensive distillation infrastructure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If acetone drying is performed at large scale, then dehydration capacity is improved, but volatile organic compound emissions and environmental concerns increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedehydration capacityVSAvoidvolatile organic compound emissions
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention recovers acetone from the dehydration process by utilizing the phase expansion of carbon dioxide. The CO2 gas expansion naturally carries acetone vapor away from the feedstock, allowing acetone to be condensed and reused. This recovery mechanism reduces volatile organic compound emissions and enables large-scale dehydration with minimal environmental impact

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Solution Approach 2:

Carbon dioxide acts as an intermediary substance that facilitates the separation of acetone from water-saturated feedstock. The CO2 supercritical fluid extracts acetone, then upon pressure reduction, expands to gas phase carrying acetone away from the system, enabling large-scale operation with controlled emissions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Device complexity

If thermal drying techniques are used instead of acetone drying, then capital and operating expenses are reduced, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperating expenseVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention replaces thermal energy input with mechanical energy input. Instead of using heat for drying, the system uses pressurized carbon dioxide in supercritical state that can be converted to gas phase through pressure reduction. This mechanical phase transition approach achieves dehydration with lower energy consumption compared to thermal drying methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method enables energy-efficient, economically viable, and environmentally responsible dehydration of various feedstocks by reducing acetone usage and energy input, while effectively recovering and reusing acetone and carbon dioxide, thus minimizing environmental impact.

Implementation Method 1

contacting the hydrated feedstock comprising water and insoluble solid with acetone, thereby yielding a first slurry comprised of acetone, water and the insoluble solid, wherein the acetone extracts the water from the insoluble solid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLiquid-liquid extraction: Liquid-Liquid Extraction

Implementation Method 2

contacting the solution with vapor phase carbon dioxide, thereby splitting the solution into an acetone-rich phase and a water-rich phase

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase splitting: Phase Change

Implementation Method 3

extracting the acetone and water from the insoluble solid by contacting with liquid phase carbon dioxide; wherein the carbon dioxide displaces the water and acetone in the insoluble solid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCarbonation: Absorption (physical)

Implementation Method 4

depressurizing the insoluble solid saturated with liquid phase carbon dioxide to atmospheric pressure to release gas phase carbon dioxide, thereby yielding dehydrated insoluble solid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDepressurization: Depressurisation

Data Source

PatentEP2499093B1Energy efficient acetone drying method
Publication Date: 2017.05.31 DYNASEP
  • EP2499093B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2499093B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2499093B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present invention provides energy and economically efficient and environmentally responsible processes for using acetone to dry, dehydrate and/or dewater various hydrated feedstocks.