Acoustic Wave Device Reflectors with Gradient Electrode Finger Widths

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Acoustic wave devices with interdigital transducer (IDT) electrodes and reflectors on a single-layer piezoelectric substrate suffer from excessive stop band responses, leading to degraded attenuation characteristics and insertion loss when connected in composite filter devices.

Innovation Solution

The acoustic wave device incorporates a piezoelectric substrate with a laminated structure of high-acoustic-velocity and low-acoustic-velocity layers, featuring IDT electrodes and reflectors with varying electrode finger widths and orientations to reduce or prevent stop band responses, and a composite filter device design that includes an acoustic wave resonator to minimize spurious modes and confine energy effectively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If reflectors with uniform electrode finger width are used, then the device structure is simple and easy to manufacture, but stop band response is excessive and attenuation characteristics are degraded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidstop band response
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The electrode fingers of the reflectors are designed with non-uniform widths, where the width varies along the propagation direction of the acoustic wave. Specifically, the electrode finger width is smaller at the input end and larger at the output end, creating a gradient structure. This local variation in geometry suppresses the stop band response by reducing the periodicity effect that causes spurious reflections, while maintaining manufacturability through standard photolithography processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The reflector structure employs asymmetric electrode finger widths where adjacent fingers have different widths. This asymmetry breaks the periodic symmetry of the traditional uniform reflector design, thereby suppressing the formation of stop bands. The asymmetric pattern is achieved by designing electrode fingers with widths that alternate or gradiently change, preventing coherent spurious wave generation while maintaining effective acoustic wave reflection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Object-generated harmful factors

If reflectors with varying electrode finger widths are used, then stop band response is reduced and attenuation characteristics are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestop band responseVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The complexity is localized only to the reflector electrode finger widths, while the rest of the device structure (IDT electrodes, substrate, encapsulation) remains conventional. The varying widths are implemented within the existing manufacturing framework, requiring only modified photolithography patterns. This localized approach minimizes overall device complexity while achieving the desired suppression of stop band response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Adaptability or versatility

If filter devices are connected in composite filter devices, then filtering functionality is enhanced, but insertion loss increases due to stop band response

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefiltering functionalityVSAvoidinsertion loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The non-uniform electrode finger width structure creates an effective 'acoustic porosity' by introducing controlled variations in the reflector geometry. This variation acts as an acoustic impedance gradient that allows pass-band signals to transmit while suppressing stop band frequencies. The gradient structure effectively filters out spurious frequencies without causing excessive insertion loss, enabling efficient composite filter device operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Significantly reduces or prevents stop band responses, enhancing attenuation characteristics and insertion loss performance in composite filter devices by efficiently confining acoustic wave energy and reducing spurious modes.

Implementation Method 1

an acoustic wave device according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention includes a piezoelectric substrate, an interdigital transducer (IDT) electrode provided on or above the piezoelectric substrate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPiezoelectric effect: Piezoelectric Effect

Implementation Method 2

a propagation direction of an acoustic wave on a piezoelectric substrate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic wave propagation: Sound

Data Source

PatentUS11611326B2Acoustic wave device and composite filter device
Publication Date: 2023.03.21 MURATA MFG CO LTD
  • US11611326B2 patent drawing
  • US11611326B2 patent drawing
  • US11611326B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An acoustic wave device includes a piezoelectric substrate, an interdigital transducer (IDT) electrode provided on the piezoelectric substrate, and a pair of reflectors provided on both sides of the IDT electrode in a first direction on the piezoelectric substrate, the first direction being a propagation direction of an acoustic wave. The pair of reflectors include a plurality of electrode fingers and a plurality of electrode fingers, respectively, which extend in a second direction, the second direction being perpendicular to the first direction. The electrode finger widths of second end portions are greater than the electrode finger widths of first end portions. The electrode finger width at any given position in the electrode fingers is equal to or greater than the electrode finger width at a position closer than the given position to the first end portions.