Active Vehicle Aerodynamics for Transient Downforce Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current active aerodynamics systems for high-performance vehicles, particularly hypercars, fail to accurately manage extreme transient conditions due to their reliance on vehicle speed alone, neglecting other dynamic parameters that significantly influence vehicle behavior, leading to inadequate response times and aerodynamic force variations necessary for handling the high accelerations and decelerations of these vehicles.

Innovation Solution

An active aerodynamics system that incorporates management and control means to adjust the front and rear aerodynamic assemblies based on real-time dynamic parameters such as ride height, acceleration, and steering angles, using sensors, elaborating units, and actuators to dynamically alter the configuration of aerodynamic elements like flaps, wing-shaped elements, and diffusers to optimize downforce distribution and airflow, independent of linear speed, and capable of managing transient conditions across multiple axes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If active aerodynamics systems adjust aerodynamic force based on vehicle speed alone, then the system structure remains simple, but the system cannot accurately manage extreme transient conditions and weight transfer in hypercars

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to manage extreme transient conditionsVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system continuously monitors multiple dynamic parameters including ride height variations, lateral acceleration, longitudinal acceleration, and steering angle, using this feedback to dynamically adjust aerodynamic device configurations. This multi-parameter feedback approach enables accurate management of extreme transient conditions while maintaining system adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from static speed-based control to dynamic multi-parameter control, allowing aerodynamic devices to adapt in real-time to changing vehicle conditions. The aerodynamic devices themselves are designed to be dynamically adjustable, changing their configuration based on the complex interplay of multiple measured parameters rather than simple speed thresholds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If aerodynamic devices are fixed in configuration, then the system complexity is reduced, but the vehicle cannot optimize downforce distribution during cornering, braking, or acceleration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaerodynamic force adjustment speedVSAvoidnumber of actuators and sensors
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The aerodynamic system is divided into multiple independent adjustable devices including front wings, rear wings, diffusers, and spoilers, each capable of independent configuration. This segmentation allows targeted adjustment of downforce distribution at different locations on the vehicle, enabling precise control during cornering, braking, and acceleration without requiring complete system reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control system integrates multiple functions into a single coordinated system that simultaneously manages drag reduction, downforce generation, and weight transfer compensation. The same sensor network and control unit that monitor ride height and acceleration also drive the aerodynamic devices, creating a multi-functional system that handles various driving conditions through unified control logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If the system responds only to linear speed changes, then the response time is reduced, but the system fails to account for weight transfer and lateral dynamics during transient maneuvers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedynamic parameter measurement accuracyVSAvoidsensor and control architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements comprehensive feedback from multiple sensor types including ride height sensors, acceleration sensors, and steering angle sensors. This multi-source feedback provides precise measurement of the vehicle's dynamic state, capturing weight transfer and lateral dynamics that speed-only systems would miss. The control system processes this detailed feedback to make informed adjustments to aerodynamic device configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control system acts as an intermediary that integrates data from diverse sensor sources and translates this information into coordinated actuator commands. Rather than directly connecting each sensor to each actuator, the control system processes and correlates multiple parameter streams, identifying the appropriate aerodynamic adjustments needed based on the combined information from ride height, acceleration, and steering angle measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system enhances vehicle dynamics during extreme maneuvers by providing precise control over aerodynamic forces, improving cornering, braking, and cooling efficiency, while maintaining optimal aerodynamic loads for enhanced stability and responsiveness, effectively addressing the limitations of existing systems in managing high-performance vehicles.

Implementation Method 1

accurate balancing and determination of aerodynamic lift and drag

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic force: Drag

Implementation Method 2

generate a significant aerodynamic force in a very short period of time, and in particular a significant variation of aerodynamic downforce

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic downforce: Aerofoil

Data Source

PatentEP4292911A1An active aerodynamics system for a vehicle
Publication Date: 2023.12.20 BUGATTI RIMAC D O O
  • EP4292911A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4292911A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4292911A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A vehicle comprises a front end and a rear end respectively located at a front height and at a rear height, a front aero assembly associated to the front end to generate a front aerodynamic force and a rear aero assembly associated to the rear end to generate a rear aerodynamic force; the vehicle further comprises management and control means active on the front aero assembly and/or on the rear aero assembly so as to contain and/or limit, under transient conditions comprising at least a longitudinal and/or lateral acceleration or deceleration of the vehicle occurring from the condition of travel at a given constant speed, variations of front height and/or rear height to being respectively greater or equal to a front end threshold height and a rear end threshold height.